Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66742
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institution for Home Science and Higher Education for women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institution for Home Science and Higher Education for women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institution for Home Science and Higher Education for women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institution for Home Science and Higher Education for women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institution for Home Science and Higher Education for women
The rapid growth of recorded educational content has increased the amount of lecture material that students must review and organize. Manual note-taking during fast-paced lectures may cause important concepts to be missed and requires additional time for revision. This paper presents an AI-based lecture notes generation system that converts uploaded or recorded lecture audio into structured digital learning material. The proposed system accepts lecture audio through a web interface and uses a Flask-based backend to coordinate audio preprocessing, speech recognition, and natural language processing. The audio is prepared using Librosa and noise-reduction techniques before OpenAI Whisper is used to generate a textual transcript. The transcript is subsequently processed using NLP techniques, with RAKE used to extract important keywords and a transformer-based T5-family model used for summarization and question-answer generation. The resulting transcript, keywords, summary,structured notes, and question-answer content are presented to the user through the application interface. The project integrates established speech and language technologies into a single educational workflow and is intended to reduce manual note-preparation effort. No numerical accuracy, dataset size, processing-time, or user-study results are reported in this paper because validated experimental measurements were not supplied with the project materials.
KEYWORDS
The AI-based Lecture Notes Generation System provides an integrated approach for converting recorded lecture audio into structured digital learning material. The system combines audio preprocessing, Whisper-based speech recognition, NLP-based transcript processing, RAKE keyword extraction, transformer-based summarization, structured note generation, and question answering. The modular Flask-based backend coordinates the processing stages, while HTML, CSS, and JavaScript provide the user-facing interface. The main usefulness of the proposed system is its ability to connect speech recognition with downstream language-processing functions rather than stopping at transcription. The resulting representation can support revision by presenting a transcript, important keywords, a concise summary, structured notes, and content-related questions and answers. The system therefore provides a practical foundation for AI-assisted educational content processing. The current work has several limitations. Speech-recognition quality may vary with noise, accents, overlapping speech, and recording conditions. Long recordings can require substantial processing time. Abstractive summaries may omit details or require verification against the source transcript. In addition, the exact T5-family checkpoint used in the final implementation must be verified because the project description and project presentation identify different model variants. Future development can extend the system toward multilingual speech support, real-time lecture transcription, speaker identification, improved summarization, retrieval-grounded question answering, cloud deployment, mobile applications, and personalized learning features. Future experiments should also establish a representative evaluation dataset and report WER, summarization metrics, keyword-extraction metrics, QA performance, processing time, and user evaluation.
[1] G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. E. Dahl, A.-r. Mohamed, N. Jaitly, A. Senior, V. Vanhoucke, P. Nguyen, B. Kingsbury, and T. N. Sainath, “Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82–97, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597. [2] R. Prabhavalkar, T. Hori, T. N. Sainath, R. Schlüter, and S. Watanabe, “End-to-end speech recognition: A survey,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process., vol. 32, pp. 325–351, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2023.3328283. [3] A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision,” arXiv:2212.04356, 2022. [4] S. Rose, D. Engel, N. Cramer, and W. Cowley, “Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents,” in Text Mining: Applications and Theory. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 2010, pp. 1–20, doi: 10.1002/9780470689646.ch1. [5] C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y. Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020. [6] R. Mihalcea and P. Tarau, “TextRank: Bringing order into texts,” in Proc. 2004 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Barcelona, Spain, 2004, pp. 404–411. [7] J. Zhang, Y. Zhao, M. Saleh, and P. J. Liu, “PEGASUS: Pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization,” in Proc. 37th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), 2020, pp. 11328–11339. [8] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proc. 2019 Conf. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2019, pp. 4171–4186. [9] P. Rajpurkar, J. Zhang, K. Lopyrev, and P. Liang, “SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text,” in Proc. 2016 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Austin, TX, USA, 2016, pp. 2383–2392, doi: 10.18653/v1/D16-1264. [10] C.-Y. Lin, “ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries,” in Text Summarization Branches Out, Barcelona, Spain, 2004, pp. 74–81.
Publication Date
8/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...