Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62023
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Engineering
Terna Engineering College, University
Department of Computer Engineering
Terna Engineering College, University
Department of Computer Engineering
Terna Engineering College, University
Department of Computer Engineering
Terna Engineering College, University
Department of Computer Engineering
Terna Engineering College, University
The rapid expansion of data-driven applications has intensified the need for accessible machine learning solutions that do not require specialized expertise. Conventional ML workflows demand proficiency in data preprocessing, feature engineering, algorithm selection, and hyperparameter tuning, creating substantial obstacles for domain specialists lacking ML backgrounds. This paper introduces SmartPipeline, a comprehensive Automated Machine Learning platform that simplifies the entire ML pipeline through intelligent automation. The proposed system implements a modular microservices architecture incorporating automatic data type detection across multiple file formats, adaptive preprocessing strategies with configurable pipelines, parallel multi-algorithm training supporting nine distinct models, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization with early stopping mechanisms, and diversity-aware ensemble learning. SmartPipeline uniquely accommodates both supervised and unsupervised learning paradigms with automatic task type inference, dimensionality reduction through Principal Component Analysis, and clustering capabilities utilizing five distinct algorithms including KMeans, DBSCAN, Agglomerative Clustering, Gaussian Mixture Models, and BIRCH. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that SmartPipeline achieves competitive predictive performance while reducing model development duration by approximately 85 percent compared to manual approaches. The platform processes diverse file formats including CSV, Excel, PDF, and image files, automatically detects appropriate learning paradigms, and provides real-time progress tracking with interpretable results. SmartPipeline represents a meaningful contribution toward democratizing production-grade machine learning for users across varying technical proficiencies.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented SmartPipeline, a comprehensive AutoML platform automating the complete machine learning pipeline from data ingestion through model deployment. Principal contributions include a unified architecture supporting both supervised and unsupervised learning workflows, intelligent preprocessing with automatic strategy selection, multimetric model evaluation with anti-overfitting mechanisms, diversity-aware ensemble construction, and interpretable results with confidence scoring. Experimental evaluation demonstrated competitive predictive performance while substantially reducing development effort. The platform successfully processes diverse file formats and automatically detects appropriate learning paradigms.
[1] F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges, Springer, 2019. [2] X. He, K. Zhao, and X. Chu, AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 212, 2021. [3] M. Feurer, A. Klein, K. Eggensperger, J. Springenberg, M. Blum, and F. Hutter, Efficient and Robust Automated Machine Learning, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015. [4] E. LeDell and S. Poirier, H2O AutoML: Scalable Automatic Machine Learning, ICML AutoML Workshop, 2020. [5] Google Cloud, Cloud AutoML Technical Documentation, 2023. [6] Microsoft Azure, Azure Machine Learning Automated ML Documentation, 2023. [7] R. S. Olson and J. H. Moore, TPOT: A Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Machine Learning, ICML AutoML Workshop, 2016. [8] J. Snoek, H. Larochelle, and R. P. Adams, Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012. [9] T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework, International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019. [10] D. H. Wolpert, Stacked Generalization, Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 241-259, 1992. [11] R. E. Schapire, The Strength of Weak Learnability, Machine Learning, vol. 5, pp. 197-227, 1990. [12] R. Caruana, A. Niculescu-Mizil, G. Crew, and A. Ksikes, Ensemble Selection from Libraries of Models, International Conference on Machine Learning, 2004. [13] Y. Liu, Z. Li, H. Xiong, X. Gao, and J. Wu, Understanding of Internal Clustering Validation Measures, IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2010. [14] F. Biessmann et al., DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 20, pp. 1-6, 2019. [15] S. Krishnan, J. Wang, M. J. Franklin, K. Goldberg, and T. Kraska, ActiveClean: Interactive Data Cleaning for Statistical Modeling, International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2016.
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...