Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68631
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Engineering
SVPM's College of Engineering Malegoan bk

Computer Engineering
SVPM's College of Engineering Malegoan bk

Computer Engineering
SVPM's College of Engineering Malegoan bk

Computer Engineering
SVPM's College of Engineering Malegoan bk
Computer Engineering
SVPM's College of Engineering Malegoan bk
Independent mobility remains one of the hardest challenges for people with visual impairment. Traditional aids such as the white cane and guide dog are reliable but limited in range, information richness, and availability. Advances in embedded computing, computer vision, and deep learning have enabled a new generation of electronic travel aids (ETAs) that detect obstacles automatically. However, most systems still answer only the question “is something in front of me?” rather than “what is it, how dangerous is it, and what should I do?” This paper surveys the literature on obstacle detection for visually impaired users, organized around sensing modality, perception algorithm, context awareness, and user feedback. We then introduce SmartSight AI, a conceptual context-aware obstacle detection system, and position it against existing approaches. We conclude with evaluation practices, open challenges, and directions for future research.
KEYWORDS
Obstacle detection for visually impaired users has progressed from simple range sensing to deep-learning-based perception on wearable and mobile platforms. The remaining gap lies less in detecting objects than in deciding which detections matter, when, and how to communicate them. This survey organized the field by sensing, perception, context, and feedback, and proposed SmartSight AI as a conceptual framework that places context-aware risk prioritization at the center of system design. Advancing this vision will require robust on-device models, representative datasets, and, above all, sustained co-design and evaluation with visually impaired users.
[1] World Health Organization, World Report on Vision. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2019. [2] R. R. A. Bourne et al., “Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Lancet Glob. Health, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. e888–e897, 2017. [3] D. Dakopoulos and N. G. Bourbakis, “Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids for blind: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2010. [4] W. Elmannai and K. Elleithy, “Sensor-based assistive devices for visually-impaired people: Current status, challenges, and future directions,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 565, 2017. [5] M. Poggi and S. Mattoccia, “A wearable mobility aid for the visually impaired based on embedded 3D vision and deep learning,” in Proc. IEEE Symp. Comput. Commun. (ISCC), 2016, pp. 208–213. [6] Y. H. Lee and G. Medioni, “RGB-D camera based wearable navigation system for the visually impaired,” Comput. Vis. Image Underst., vol. 149, pp. 3–20, 2016. [7] R. Tapu, B. Mocanu, and T. Zaharia, “Wearable assistive devices for visually impaired: A state of the art survey,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 137, pp. 37–52, 2020. [8] R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós, “ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, 2015. [9] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, “Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1137–1149, 2017. W. Liu et al., “SSD: Single shot multibox detector,” in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV), 2016, pp. 21–37.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...