SPHERE ACCOMMODATION & SERVICES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The platform of Nexora that is created in the course of this research serves as a unified web-based solution for accommodation discovery as well as access to key services [1], [3], [6]. By using accommodation listings, listings of owners, location-based search, integration of maps and services like mess, laundry, and vehicle, the platform solves many problems which arise during searching of accommodation in a new city [2], [5], [7].Node.js, Express.js, MongoDB Atlas, Cloudinary CDN, JavaScript, Bootstrap, and CSS are the technologies used to provide the necessary infrastructure for building and maintaining the platform [3], [6], [8]. The platform helps students, working professionals, and other people by providing all the accommodation details and services in one place.

1. N. Gurran, Z. Nasreen, and P. Shrestha, “Platform-Enabled Informality? Planning for New Housing Practices in Australia,”Journal of the American Planning Association, pp. 672–685, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01944363.2024.2326554. 2. D. Rogers, S. Maalsen, P. Wolifson, and D. Fields, “Proptech and the private rental sector: Novel modes of extraction at thenexus              of   rental   housing   and   platform   rentierisation,”   Urban   Studies,   vol.   61,   no.   14,   pp.       2778–2794,               2024,                doi:10.1177/00420980241262916. 3. J. Heslop, J. Chambers, J. Maloney, G. Spurgeon, H. Swainston, and H. Woodall, “Re-contextualising purpose-built student accommodation in secondary cities: The role of planning policy, consultation and economic need during austerity,” Urban Studies, vol. 60, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00420980221121569. 4. N. Livingstone, S. Fiorentino, and M. Short, “Density, Planning and the Emergent Landscapes of Purpose-Built Student Accommodation in England,” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 5, article 1119399, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2023.1119399. 5. K. S. Sridhar, “Understanding the Digital Platform Economy: Effect of Airbnb on Housing in Indian Cities,” Housing PolicyDebate, vol. 32, iss. 4–5, pp. 713–729, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1929389. 6. Z. Nasreen and K. Ruming, “Struggles and opportunities at the platform interface: tenants’ experience of negotiating shared rooms through digital platforms in Sydney,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1537–1554, 2022, doi:10.1007/s10901-021-09909-x. 7. M. Ferreri and R. Sanyal, “Digital informalisation: Rental housing, platforms, and the management of risk,” Housing Studies,vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1035–1053, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2021.2009779. 8. C. Hess, A. Acolin, R. Walter, I. Kennedy, S. Chasins, and K. Crowder, “Searching for housing in the digital age: Representation of neighborhoods on internet rental housing platforms,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 53,no. 8, pp. 2012–2032, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0308518X211034177. 9. G. Boeing, M. Besbris, D. Wachsmuth, and J. Wegmann, “Tilted platforms: Rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies,” Urban Transformations, vol. 3, no. 1, art. 6, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2. 10. J. Steegmans and J. de Bruin, “Online housing search: A gravity model approach,” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 3, p. e0247712, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247712.