Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67384
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Education, School of Education
Central University of Gujarat, Vadodara
Contemporary educational discourse has increasingly asserted the view that education should have to focuses on all dimensions of personality apart from cognitive competence and occupational readiness. This paper has a conceptual argument for spirituality and philosophically well-grounded dimension of holistic development in education. Drawing on Western humanistic and transpersonal psychology alongside Indian philosophical and pedagogical traditions including the classical concepts of vidya, prajna, dharma, and Loksangrah. The paper distinguishes spirituality from religion, situates it within the broader construct of holistic development, and examines its implications for curriculum, pedagogy, and institutional culture. The paper further engages critically with the definitional challenges that attend the integration of spirituality into pluralistic and secular educational settings and considers policy implications accordance with India's National Education Policy 2020. It concludes that spirituality, properly and cautiously conceived, functions not as a discrete curricular addition but as an integrating orientation across the cognitive, emotional, ethical, and social dimensions of learner development.
KEYWORDS
This paper has argued that spirituality can be carefully distinguished from religion, it have a philosophically well-grounded dimension of holistic development in education. Western humanistic and transpersonal psychology and Indian philosophical traditions, despite differing terminology and importance, converge on the view that education have the aim for the whole personality development which includes intellect, emotion, ethics, relationship, and cooperative approach. Transforming this conceptual argument into practice requires carefully integrating in existing pedagogical models (contemplative practice, service-learning, reflective and values-based curricula) and policy frameworks (such as India's NEP 2020) suggest workable, non-doctrinal paths forward. Future research might usefully move from this conceptual foundation to empirical investigation examining.
Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis: A manual of principles and techniques. Hobbs, Dorman & Co. Barbezat, D. P., & Bush, M. (2014). Contemplative practices in higher education: Powerful methods to transform teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283860958_Contemplative_Practices_in_Higher_Education_Powerful_Methods_to_Transform_Teaching_and_Learning_by_Daniel_P_Barbezat_and_Mirabai_Bush_review Bhagavad Gita (1972). Bhaktivedanta book trust. India Dalai Lalma, H.H. (2012). Beyond Religion ethics for whole world. Harper Collins publisher. India Furco, A. (2003). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In Campus Compact (Ed.), Introduction to service-learning toolkit: Readings and resources for faculty (2nd ed.). Campus Compact. https://civicengagement.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/partnership-resources/Furco_Service_Learning_A_Balanced_Approach_to_Experiential_Education.pdf Hill, P.C., Pargament,K.I.(2003). Advances in the conceptualisation and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist,58,64-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10822414_Advances_in_the_Conceptualization_and_Measurement_of_Religion_and_Spirituality Hill, P.C., Pargament,K.I., Hood,R.W.,Ir.,McCullough,M.E.,Swyers,J/P/,Larson,D.B.,et al.(2000). Conceptualising religion and spirituality: Points of Commonality, points of departure. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 30,51-77. DOI 10.1111/1468-5914.00119 Hiriyanna, M. (1932). Outlines of Indian philosophy. George Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100045915
Publication Date
9/21/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...