Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62934
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Civil Engineering
Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Sangamner
Engineers often encounter difficulties when building on or with Black Cotton soil because of its poor engineering performance, which includes high clay content, low strength and an inadequate bearing capacity. The need to find a stabilizing substance was prompted by the poor performance of BC soil. Conventional stabilizers like gravel, sand, cement are depleting and becoming expansive day by day. Therefore, it became imperative to search for alternative stabilizers that are both economical and environmental friendly. Lime, fly ash, and bioenzyme (Terrazyme) have recently shown effectiveness as stabilizing agents. In this paper, soil samples were evaluated using fly ash, lime, and bioenzymes. The results of the Compaction test, Consistency limit, California Bearing Ratio have all been examined and discussed. It has been noted that a notable improvement has occurred to engineering properties of B.C. soil with these stabilizers.
KEYWORDS
After performing the entire test on BC soil in laboratory with the addition of different stabilizing agents some of the following conclusions are drawn as below, i.After addition of bioenzyme, unsoaked CBR values are significantly increase with the increase in curing period and also with increase in amount of dosages. ii.Bioenzyme decreases liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soil after 1 to 4 weeks of curing period and also with the amount of dosages. The mix becomes very stiff after weeks of curing. iii.As increase in curing period and dosages of bioenzyme, the MDD of treated soil increases and OMC is observed to be decreasing. iv.Unsoaked CBR values gradually increase with the increase in lime addition up to 44.55% for lime content 4% so, the optimum lime content is observed at about 4%. v.Addition of lime with the soil shows that, Plasticity index decreases with increase in lime content up to 2 %. vi.MDD of treated soil is increases up to 2% and then decreases with lime content and OMC is observed to be reverse of MDD result. vii.The Increase in Unsoaked CBR values with the increasing percentages of fly ash and then decreases after 30%. viii.Plasticity index is decreases with increase in addition of fly ash up to 40%. ix.MDD increased slightly up to 40% of fly ash and then it decreases. OMC of B,C. soil treated with fly ash decreases with the increase in fly ash content. x.Bioenzyme is best stabilizing agent as compared to lime and fly ash and also has life time sustainability, so it can be used in Expressways and national highways. xi.Lime and Fly ash are cheaper materials and has considerable scope for construction of low cost roads such as Village roads.
1. Lekha B. M, GouthamSarang, Chaitali N., Ravi Shankar A. U.(2013), “Laboratory Investigation on black cotton soil stabilized with nontraditional stabilizer ”,IOSR.JMCE Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering , eISSN 2278-1684, pISSN 2320-334X, pp 07-13. 2. S. M. Lim, D. C. Wijeyesekera, A. J. M.S. Lim, I. B. H. Bakar (2014), “Critical Review of Innovative Soil Road Stabilization Techniques”, IJEAT InternationalJournal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, ISSN 2249 –8958, Volume-3 Issue-5. 3. Vijay Rajoria, SuneetKaur (Jan-2014),“A review on stabilization of soil using bio-enzyme”, IJRET International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN 2319-1163, pISSN 2321-7308. 4. Puente Agarwal, suneetkaur (May 2014),“Effect of bio-enzyme stabilization on unconfined compressive strength of expansive soil”, IJRET International journal of research in engineering and technology, eISSN 2319-1163, pISSN 2321-7308. 5. Bergmann, R (2000), "Soil stabilizers on universally accessible trails", USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center. 6. Manoj Shukla, Dr. Sunil Bose and Dr. P.K. Sikdar, (2003), “Bio-Enzyme for Stabilization of Soil in Road Construction- A Cost Effective Approach”, IRC Seminar Integrated Development of Rural and Arterial Road Networks for Socio-Economic development, New Delhi. 7. A.U. Ravi Shankar, Harsha Kumar Rai, Ramesha Mithanthaya I. (2009), “Bio-enzyme Stabilized Lateritic Soil as a Highway Material”, JIRC Journal of Indian Road Congress, pp 553-557. 8. C. Venkatasubramanian, G. Dhinakaran, (2011),“Effect of Bio-Enzymatic Soil stabilization on unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio”, IJEAS International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 6(5),pp 295-298. 9. K. Ameta, Dangda Sandeep, D.G.M. and Purohit Wayal A.S.(2004),“Economics Of Stabilizing Bentonite Soil With Lime-Gypsumn”, JGEJournal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol-12, pp 34-38. 10. Dr. A.V. Narasihmarao, B.Penchalaiah, Dr.M.Chittranjan, Dr.P.Ramesh, (2014), “Compressibility Behaviour of Black Cotton Soil Admixed with Lime and Rice-Husk Ash”, IJIRSET International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 4.
Publication Date
5/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...