Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59830
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Stock price prediction remains one of the most challenging tasks in financial forecasting due to the inherent volatility and nonlinearity of financial markets. This paper presents a comprehensive review of machine learning approaches for stock price prediction, comparing traditional statistical methods with modern deep learning architectures. We analyze various algorithms including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Our comparative analysis reveals that LSTM-based deep learning models achieve superior performance with prediction accuracies ranging from 85% to 89%, significantly outperforming traditional regression methods. The study examines key technical indicators, feature engineering techniques, and model optimization strategies that enhance prediction accuracy. We also discuss the challenges of market volatility, overfitting, and computational complexity. The findings demonstrate that sophisticated neural network architectures, particularly LSTM networks, offer more reliable predictions for investors and financial analysts in volatile market conditions. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on intelligent financial forecasting systems and provides practical insights for implementing machine learning-based trading strategies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/21/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...