Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM49651
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
â Concrete is a fundamental material in modern infrastructure, but its primary binder, Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), is associated with significant environmental drawbacks, including high carbon dioxide (COâ) emissions and depletion of natural resources. To address these concerns, this study explores the use of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs), specifically silica fume and corn ash, as partial replacements for cement in M20 grade concrete. Silica fume, an industrial by-product with high pozzolanic reactivity, and corn ash, an emerging agricultural waste material rich in silica, were combined in varying proportions to evaluate their synergistic effects on concrete performance. Five concrete mixes were prepared, ranging from a control mix with 100% cement to blends with up to 10% silica fume and 9% corn ash. The mixes were tested for compressive strength, split tensile strength, and water absorption at 7, 28, and 90 days of curing. Results indicated that a 6% replacement of cement with corn ash, in combination with 10% silica fume (Mix SC3), achieved the best overall performance, balancing strength and durability enhancements with sustainability benefits. This study highlights the potential of integrating industrial and agricultural waste in concrete production to reduce environmental impact, conserve natural resources, and support low-carbon construction practices.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/7/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...