Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65291
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Civil engineering
Vidya Pratishthans Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute of Engineering and Technology of Engineering and Technology Baramati, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Civil engineering
Vidya Pratishthans Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute of Engineering and Technology of Engineering and Technology Baramati, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Deterioration of reinforced concrete (RC) structures due to corrosion, environmental exposure, and increased loading necessitates sustainable retrofitting solutions beyond conventional Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)-based materials, which suf-fer from shrinkage, poor bonding, and high CO2 emissions. This study investigates ambient-cured geopolymer repair mortar, synthesized from fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) activated by 12M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) with a ratio of 2.5:1, for strengthening RC beams. Experimental evaluation of 100×100×400 mm beam specimens demonstrates superior compressive strength (40–60 MPa), enhanced bond characteristics, and 20–40% improvement in flexural capacity compared with OPC-based systems. These results are achieved through ambient curing without thermal treatment. Optimized mix proportions and the use of iron mesh reinforcement enable practical field application while reducing carbon emissions by approximately 40–60%. Load–deflection analysis further confirms improved ductility and crack resistance, addressing challenges related to adhesion compatibility and integration with existing design practices. The findings highlight geopolymer mortar as a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative for structural rehabilitation and infrastructure maintenance.
KEYWORDS
The growing body of research on geopolymer mortars for retrofitting reinforced concrete (RC) structures highlights their significant potential in terms of strength, durability, and environmental performance. These materials provide a sustain-able alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) systems, offering benefits such as rapid curing, enhanced chemical resistance, and a lower carbon footprint. However, achieving widespread adoption and consistent performance will require continued research and the development of standardized prac-tices. • Standardized Mix Development: There is an urgent need to develop codified and field-tested geopolymer mix designs specifically tailored for retrofitting applications. Such formulations should ensure predictable mechanical properties, compatibility with substrates, and ease of application in diverse site conditions. • Enhanced Interface Engineering: Improved surface preparation techniques and interface optimization are es-sential to enhance long-term bond strength and minimize shrinkage-induced cracking or delamination in composite systems. • Pilot Projects and Case Studies: Large-scale pilot applications and long-term monitoring are required to evaluate the performance of geopolymer-based retrofits under varying climatic, chemical, and loading environ-ments. These studies will also help establish cost-benefit models over the lifecycle of the structure. • Code and Guideline Development: Development of comprehensive design standards and practical field guide-lines will facilitate the adoption of geopolymer mortars in mainstream civil infrastructure repair. Codes should address issues such as curing practices, environmental exposure, worker safety, and seismic resilience. Future research should explore hybrid systems that incorpo-rate natural fibers, nano-additives, or advanced reinforcements to further improve strength and ductility. Incorporating real-time structural health monitoring into geopolymer-repaired systems, along with developing comprehensive economic models that consider lifecycle performance rather than just initial costs, will help promote the sustainable and efficient use of geopolymers in infrastructure rehabilitation.
[1] E. Vasconcelos, S. Fernandes, B. Aguiar, and F. Pacheco-Torgal, “Con-crete Retrofitting Using CFRP and Geopolymer Mortars,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 730, pp. 427–432, 2013. [2] V. Sreevidya and M. Ponkishan, “Strength Evaluation of Retrofitted Geopolymer Concrete Using Natural Fibre,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1420–1425, 2020. [3] C. K. Madheswaran and P. M. Philip, “Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Flexural Behaviour of Retrofitted Reinforced Concrete Beams with Geopolymer Concrete Composites,” International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering (IJMME), vol. 14, no. 2,pp. 22–28, 2014. [4] S. Shah, P. Raithatha, and S. D. Raiyani, “Improved Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beam Strengthened Using Stainless Steel Wire Mesh,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 72, pp. 34–45, 2025. [5] S. A. Sheikh, “Performance of Concrete Structures Retrofitted with Fibre Reinforced Polymers,” Engineering Structures, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 869–879, 2002. [6] E. Vasconcelos, S. Fernandes, J. L. B. Aguiar, and F. Pacheco-Torgal, “Concrete Retrofitting Using Metakaolin Geopolymer Mortars and CFRP,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3213–3221, 2011. [7] T. Pauline and V. Ashok, “Experimental Studies on the Behaviour of Retrofitted Structural Beams,” IAETSD Journal for Advanced Research in Applied Sciences (JARAS), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 98–104, 2018. [8] C. S. Chethan Kumar and L. K. Ashwini, “Sustainable Retrofitting of Fire-Damaged Cement and Geopolymer Concrete Slabs Using Hybrid Basalt and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers,” International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 210–219, 2025. [9] G. Sivakumar, S. Maheswaran, and T. Manoharan, “Geo-Polymer Mortar as Retrofitting Material for R.C. Element,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 21, pp. e02054, 2024. [10] BEPROJECTfinal-new-sa-neww.pptx, Project Presentation, Vidya Pratishthan’s Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute of Engineering and Technol-ogy, Baramati, India, 2025.
Publication Date
6/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...