Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60212
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
â The increasing demand for construction materials has led to the excessive consumption of natural resources and the generation of large volumes of construction and demolition waste. This has created serious environmental concerns, including resource depletion, landfill overflow, and increased carbon emissions. In this context, the use of recycled materials in concrete production has emerged as a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative. This study explores the potential of recycled aggregates and other waste materials such as plastic, glass, rubber, and industrial by-products in the development of sustainable concrete. Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA), obtained from demolished structures, has been widely studied as a substitute for natural aggregates. The results indicate that concrete made with RCA can achieve satisfactory mechanical properties, including compressive strength and durability, when proper mix design and processing techniques are employed. Although the strength of recycled concrete may be slightly lower than conventional concrete, the difference is often within acceptable limits for many structural and non-structural applications. The addition of supplementary cementitious materials such as fly ash, silica fume, and ground granulated blast furnace slag further enhances the performance and durability of recycled concrete. In addition to RCA, other waste materials have also shown promising results in concrete production. For instance, waste plastic can be used as a partial replacement for aggregates, resulting in lightweight and durable concrete. Similarly, crushed glass and rubber particles improve certain properties such as thermal insulation and flexibility. Industrial by-products not only reduce the need for cement but also decrease greenhouse gas emissions associated with cement manufacturing. These materials contribute to improved sustainability by reducing environmental pollution and promoting waste utilization. From an environmental perspective, the use of recycled materials in concrete significantly reduces the carbon footprint of construction activities. It minimizes the extraction of natural aggregates, conserves energy, and reduces landfill waste. Life cycle assessment studies have demonstrated that recycled concrete can lower overall environmental impacts compared to conventional concrete. Furthermore, the concept aligns with the principles of the circular economy, where materials are reused and recycled to maintain their value for as long as possible. Despite its advantages, the use of recycled materials in concrete presents certain challenges. These include variability in material quality, higher water absorption, reduced workability, and lack of standardized guidelines. Proper treatment methods, quality control measures, and advanced technologies are required to overcome these limitations. Research and development efforts are ongoing to improve the consistency and performance of recycled concrete. In conclusion, concrete made from recycled materials offers a viable solution for sustainable construction. It not only addresses environmental issues but also supports resource conservation and waste management. With continued research, innovation, and policy support, recycled concrete has the potential to become a mainstream construction material in the future.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...