Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67168
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of chemistry
SKR Govt Degree College,Gudur, Tirupathi District, Andhra Pradesh.
Cisplatin remains an important antineoplastic agent, but its clinical utility is constrained by dose-limiting nephrotoxicity. The supplied study by Kim et al. reported the synthesis of 16 sulforaphane analogues and their evaluation in cisplatin-treated LLC-PK1 renal epithelial cells. The compounds were prepared from primary amines through dithiocarbamate formation followed by Boc2O/DMAP-mediated conversion to the corresponding isothiocyanates. The analogue series was designed to explore the influence of side-chain lipophilicity, chain length and steric features on cytoprotective activity. Several analogues performed comparably to or better than sulforaphane in the cell-survival assay; notably, SF5 produced approximately 93% cell survival at 2.5 µM, while SF6, SF8 and SF13 exceeded 80% survival at 2.5 µM. Mechanistic experiments with SF5 associated protection with suppression of the JNK–p53–caspase-3 apoptotic cascade. This focused review reorganizes those findings into a broader medicinal-chemistry and renal-protection framework and incorporates subsequent literature showing that sulforaphane activity is also closely linked to NRF2-dependent antioxidant and cytoprotective signaling. Current evidence therefore supports a multidimensional model in which isothiocyanate structure, electrophilic reactivity, oxidative-stress control and apoptotic signaling collectively determine renoprotective performance. The SF5 series provides a useful starting point for further optimization, but translation requires confirmation in human proximal-tubule models, appropriate animal studies, pharmacokinetic evaluation, and careful assessment of whether renal protection compromises the antitumor activity of cisplatin.
KEYWORDS
The supplied study provides a compact but useful example of how a natural isothiocyanate scaffold can be transformed into a small analogue library to address cisplatin-associated renal cytotoxicity. The modular CS2/Boc2O/DMAP synthetic sequence enabled preparation of 16 sulforaphane-type isothiocyanates, and the resulting SAR demonstrated that side-chain architecture strongly influences cytoprotective activity. SF5 emerged as the most compelling analogue in the reported screen, producing approximately 93% cell survival at 2.5 µM and reducing apoptosis-associated signaling in cisplatin-treated LLC-PK1 cells. [1] From a current perspective, the significance of the work extends beyond the original JNK–p53–caspase-3 observation. Subsequent research has reinforced the importance of NRF2-mediated antioxidant and cytoprotective signaling in cisplatin kidney injury and has continued to support sulforaphane as a promising preclinical renoprotective agent. Accordingly, future sulforaphane analogue development should integrate medicinal chemistry, quantitative SAR, NRF2 pharmacology, stress-kinase biology, pharmacokinetics and tumor-sparing efficacy. SF5 should therefore be regarded as a valuable lead structure for further investigation rather than as a clinically validated nephroprotective drug.
1. Kim, T., Kim, Y.-J., Han, I.-H., Lee, D., Ham, J., Kang, K. S., & Lee, J. W. (2015). The synthesis of sulforaphane analogues and their protection effect against cisplatin induced cytotoxicity in kidney cells. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 25, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.11.014 2. Motwani, S. M., Sandhu Kaur, S., & Kitchlu, A. (2022/2023). Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: Novel insights into mechanisms and preventative strategies. Seminars in Nephrology, 42(6), 151341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151341 3. Manohar, S., & Leung, N. (2018). Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: A review of the literature. Journal of Nephrology, 31, 15–25. 4. Dasari, S., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2014). Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. European Journal of Pharmacology, 740, 364–378. 5. Guerrero-Beltrán, C. E., Calderón-Oliver, M., Tapia, E., Medina-Campos, O. N., Sánchez-González, D. J., Martínez-Martínez, C. M., Ortiz-Vega, K. M., Franco, M., & Pedraza-Chaverrí, J. (2010). Sulforaphane protects against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Toxicology Letters, 192(3), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.11.007 6. Mapuskar, K. A., Pulliam, C. F., Zepeda-Orozco, D., et al. (2023). Redox regulation of Nrf2 in cisplatin-induced kidney injury. Antioxidants, 12(9), 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12091728 7. Kensler, T. W., Wakabayashi, N., & Biswal, S. (2007). Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1–Nrf2–ARE pathway. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 47, 89–116. 8. Atilano-Roque, A., Wen, X., Aleksunes, L. M., & Joy, M. S. (2016). Nrf2 activators as potential modulators of injury in human kidney cells. Toxicology Reports, 3, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.01.006 9. Pabla, N., & Dong, Z. (2008). Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: Mechanisms and renoprotective strategies. Kidney International, 73, 994–1007. 10. Monteiro, E. B., Ajackson, M., Stockler-Pinto, M. B., Guebre-Egziabher, F., Daleprane, J. B., & Soulage, C. O. (2023). Sulforaphane exhibits potent renoprotective effects in preclinical models of kidney diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Life Sciences, 322, 121664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121664
Publication Date
9/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...