Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM28985
Volume:
8 |
3 |
Mar 2024
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
ECONOMICS
GDC, SADASIVPET, SANGAREDDY DISTRICT , TELANGANA
The economic policy in India has gone through four stages since the balance of payments crisis in 1991, liberalisation and stabilisation, high growth and welfare expansion, institutional and tax reform (2014-2019) and response and recovery towards pandemic (2020-2023). The article delves into the economic performance during each phase based on the annual data from 1991 to 2023, sourced from the World Bank's World Development Indicators, along with fiscal and monetary data from the Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India. Averages, analysis of variance, Welch t test and regression with Newey–West standard errors are used. Real GDP increased by 6.1% per annum, on average, and was 6.9 times higher in 2023 than in 1990. The difference between average growth prior to and following flexible inflation targeting was not significant, while the average difference in the inflation was significantly different between the two periods (7.8% prior to flexible inflation targeting and 5.0% after). The proportion of services in GDP has increased from 37.8% to 47.6% and manufacturing has dropped from 15.7% to 13.3%. Over the last ten years, capital expenditure grew by nearly five times resulting in a fiscal deficit of the Union government coming down from 9.2% of GDP in 2020-21 to 5.6% in 2023. Year-to-year growth is associated with fluctuations in the investment rate, NOT its level. The article concludes with suggestions on manufacturing, fiscal consolidation, investment and employment.
KEYWORDS
Over the 33 years from 1991 to 2023 India's economy grew about seven-fold in real terms and became one of the largest in the world. Throughout four phases of policy with widely divergent priorities, analysis in this article indicates the growth has continued at a fairly consistent average rate. There are differences between the phases in terms of what accompanied growth. First established external stability and opened the economy. The second peaked investments and trade and concluded with high inflation and a large external deficit. The third reduced inflation and revamped the indirect tax regime, with reduced investment rate. The fourth took the biggest hit in recent economic history in this country, and brought growth back on board by putting out public capital spending, while at the same time working on reducing the fiscal deficit. Two aspects have remained throughout the four phases and characterize the agenda that remains. No increase has been achieved in the shares of manufacturing in the output, and the economy has been transformed from agriculture to services without large-scale creating of industrial jobs. And growth has depended on rising investment, which in recent years has come mainly from the public sector. The effects of policy up to 2023 have been to secure macro-economic stability in prices, external accounts and increasingly in the public finances. The challenge for the coming years is to leverage that stability to create the growth in private investment, manufacturing and jobs that the previous stages failed to deliver.
1. Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S. J., & Zilibotti, F. (2008). The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from dismantling the License Raj in India. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1397–1412. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1397 2. Ahluwalia, M. S. (2002). Economic reforms in India since 1991: Has gradualism worked? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278721 3. Basu, K., & Maertens, A. (2007). The pattern and causes of economic growth in India. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm012 4. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839533 5. Bhagwati, J. (1993). India in transition: Freeing the economy. Clarendon Press. 6. Bhagwati, J., & Panagariya, A. (2013). Why growth matters: How economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries. PublicAffairs. 7. Bosworth, B., & Collins, S. M. (2008). Accounting for growth: Comparing China and India. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.45 8. Chakravarty, S. (1987). Development planning: The Indian experience. Oxford University Press. 9. Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2019). Indian income inequality, 1922–2015: From British Raj to Billionaire Raj? Review of Income and Wealth, 65(S1), S33–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12439 10. Chodorow-Reich, G., Gopinath, G., Mishra, P., & Narayanan, A. (2020). Cash and the economy: Evidence from India's demonetization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 57–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz027
Publication Date
3/27/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...