Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53784
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the legal domain, stenographers and court reporters capture spoken proceedings using shorthand notes. These notes often contain symbols, abbreviations and non-standard orthography, making them difficult for non-experts to read. Automating the conversion of shorthand notes into legally intelligible sentences could save time, reduce transcription errors and enable more efficient access to court records. This survey analyses research on three key components of such a system: optical character recognition (OCR) for handwritten shorthand, methods for expanding abbreviations into full legal phrases and the use of large language models (LLMs) to improve sentence quality. It reviews convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN) architectures for scene and handwritten text recognition, discusses the connectionist temporal classification (CTC) loss used for unsegmented sequence labelling and summarises current approaches to abbreviation expansion and legal language modelling. The survey situates these technologies within StenoAssist—a hybrid system that recognizes shorthand images, decodes them with a lexicon and expands them into legal sentences using a glossary and an LLM. We evaluate the CRNN–lexicon pipeline on the Kaggle shorthand dataset and discuss the benefits and limitations of integrating LLMs for legal text.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/10/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...