Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67072
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-20
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Civil
Jagannath University, Jaipur, India
Civil
Jagannath University, Jaipur, India
Concrete remains the dominant construction material, yet its cement-intensive production and exposure-driven deterioration impose substantial environmental and economic burdens. This paper develops a materials-focused framework for sustainable high-performance cementitious composites (SHPCCs) that combines supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), recycled aggregate, fibre reinforcement, and durability-oriented mix design. A structured analytical program is presented using representative mixes and performance indicators for compressive strength, transport resistance, crack control, life-cycle carbon, and cost. The findings indicate that a hybrid binder containing ground-granulated blast-furnace slag and metakaolin can reduce modeled embodied carbon by 30–45% while maintaining or improving later-age strength and chloride resistance. The work translates material-selection principles into a practical design and testing sequence for civil infrastructure. It also identifies limitations associated with SCM variability, curing sensitivity, workability retention, and the need for local characterization. The paper is intended as a rigorous research-style reference for Civil Engineering Materials courses and early-stage material design studies.
KEYWORDS
1. Sustainable high-performance cementitious composites should be assessed through strength, transport resistance, crack control, constructability, carbon, and cost—not compressive strength alone. 2. A hybrid slag–metakaolin binder can plausibly lower clinker demand and improve later-age transport resistance when proportioning and curing are controlled. 3. Recycled aggregate is viable within a quality-managed system, but its absorption, grading, and contamination require explicit control. 4. Fibres enhance post-crack behavior and should be selected with workability and placement method in view. 5. Performance-based specifications and locally validated trial batches are essential before field adoption.
[1] ASTM C39/C39M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. [2] ASTM C1202, Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. [3] ASTM C1585, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes. [4] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete Institute. [5] ACI Committee 232, Use of Fly Ash in Concrete, American Concrete Institute. [6] ACI Committee 233, Slag Cement in Concrete and Mortar, American Concrete Institute. [7] EN 206, Concrete—Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. [8] P. K. Mehta and P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill. [9] K. L. Scrivener, V. M. John, and E. M. Gartner, “Eco-efficient cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 114, pp. 2–26, 2018. [10] J. Thomas, A. Sethy, and U. C. Sahoo, “Sustainable concrete materials and durability,” Construction and Building Materials, review literature. [11] fib Model Code for Concrete Structures, International Federation for Structural Concrete. [12] ISO 14040, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework.
Publication Date
9/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...