Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53111
Volume:
9 |
10 |
Oct 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study examines the economic ramifications of cola brand retaliation between India and the United States from 1977 to present, analyzing how beverage industry conflicts have influenced broader trade relations. Using mixed-methods research combining quantitative trade data analysis and qualitative policy assessment, this paper investigates the cascading effects of brand-specific trade disputes on bilateral economic relations. The research draws from World Trade Organization data, bilateral trade statistics, and industry reports spanning four decades. Results indicate that cola brand disputes have served as catalysts for broader protectionist measures, resulting in estimated bilateral trade losses of $2.3 billion over the study period. The analysis reveals three distinct phases of retaliation: the Coca-Cola expulsion era (1977-1993), the liberalization and re-entry period (1993-2010), and the contemporary regulatory warfare phase (2010-present). Findings suggest that brand-specific trade conflicts disproportionately impact consumer welfare and create precedents for non-tariff barriers in other sectors. The study concludes that cola brand retaliation exemplifies how symbolic trade actions can generate substantive economic consequences, recommending enhanced bilateral dialogue mechanisms and sector-specific dispute resolution frameworks to prevent future escalation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/17/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...