Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM36843
Volume:
8 |
7 |
Jul 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Concrete is highly versatile, capable of withstanding harsh environments and achieving inspirational forms. Modern advancements focus on enhancing its performance through innovative chemical admixtures and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). SCMs, often industrial byproducts like fly ash, silica fume, ground granulated blast furnace slag, and steel slag, replace a portion of Portland cement, reducing costs and environmental impact while improving concrete properties. Silica fume, a particularly successful SCM, significantly enhances concrete’s strength and durability, especially in high-strength applications. Steel slag, a byproduct of steel manufacturing, shows potential as an aggregate in concrete, despite its tendency to expand due to free lime and magnesium oxides. Proper treatment and the use of pozzolanic materials like silica fume can mitigate this expansion. This study investigates the mechanical properties of concrete mixes using ACC brand slag cement, fly ash cement, and their blend (1:1), modified with 10% and 20% silica fume. Natural sand (zone II, IS 383-1982) serves as the fine aggregate, and steel slag (20 mm down) as the coarse aggregate, mixed in a 1:1.5:3 ratio. Tests on 7-day, 28-day, and 56-day compressive strengths, flexural strength, porosity, and capillary absorption were conducted. Key findings include an increased water requirement with higher silica fume content, higher early strength gain with fly ash cement, and better later strength with slag cement. Silica fume reduces capillary absorption and porosity, particularly with fly ash cement.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/26/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...