Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM56557
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study looks at how people in India perceive tax evasion and avoidance, with an emphasis on the connection between ethical judgment and legal knowledge. A structured online questionnaire was used to gather primary data from a sample of 109 respondents in January 2026. Only 22.0% of respondents reported filing income tax returns, and 45.9% were aware of the legal penalties associated with tax evasion, indicating limited direct participation in the tax system, according to the findings. Respondents’ ethical opinions differed: while 27.5% agreed that tax evasion is unethical, the majority (56.0%) held a neutral opinion. On the other hand, 49.5% of respondents thought that, as long as it stays within the law, tax avoidance was morally acceptable. These findings imply that ethical acceptance is strongly influenced by legal permissibility and that ambivalent attitudes regarding tax evasion may be influenced by a lack of tax-filing experience. The study suggests using behavioral nudges to increase voluntary compliance, clearer communication that distinguishes tax avoidance from tax evasion, and targeted tax education programs for young taxpayers based on empirical data and existing literature. The study emphasizes the need for more extensive, nationally representative research to confirm and expand these findings while providing preliminary empirical support to the legal-ethical debate on taxation in India.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...