Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64754
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Education
Central University of Odisha
Independent Research
Odisha
Department of Education
Central University of Odisha
Department of Education
Central University of Odisha
The life of a teacher and teaching has been changing rapidly with the excessive use of modern technology and digital tools. Despite in-depth research on digital competence frameworks and teacher professional development as distinct areas, a detailed conceptual framework that directly links these two fields remains unexplored. This paper argues that digital competence is not merely a technical skill. It is an evolving professional ability. To stay effective, autonomous, and critically reflective in AI-enhanced education, teachers need to develop it through ongoing professional development programs. Exploring secondary sources and policy documents spanning 2015 to 2025, this paper identifies three key issues in the current literature such as, inconsistent definitions of digital competence across frameworks; mismatch between existing professional development models and new AI requirements; and ongoing uncertainty about teacher agency in AI-integrated settings. As a result, this paper proposes a conceptual framework, the Adaptive Digital Professionalism (ADP) model that shows digital competence as a context-sensitive and critically informed dimension of teacher professionalism. The paper concludes by outlining implications for institutional policy, curriculum design for teacher education, and future empirical research directions.
KEYWORDS
The study concludes that AI is no longer a future idea in education, It is already here, that’s reflected in every teacher's daily life, so what we expect from teachers and what professional expertise means. This study shows our field is at a turning point in the field of digital education. We have plenty of frameworks, research findings, and policy advice related to digital technology. But we still struggle with unclear definitions, systems that don’t line up, and weak understanding of how digital skills connect to ongoing teacher training. This article explored that the mentioned tensions cannot be solved solely through the elaboration of small competence frameworks and the expansion of continuous professional development programmes. Rather, what is effective is a conceptual reorientation and a transition from conceiving digital competence as a static representation of skills to be imparted to teachers. At last, to reconceptualise it as a dynamic professional capacity that is cultivated through recursive engagement with critical inquiry, adaptive learning, and institutionally supported agency, the Adaptive Digital Professionalism (ADP) model advanced a conceptual apparatus for this reorientation. So the CPD of teachers in the digital era ultimately requires strong acknowledgement that teachers are not dependent users of technology, but they are the professional agents who shape the role of technology in the lives of learners. In this context, Digital competence is understood as a threshold to be crossed, but a professional orientation needs to be continuously cultivated with the help of continuous professional development.
1. Al-Zyoud, H. M. M. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in teacher professional development. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6263–6272. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082344 2. Anis, M. (2024). Teacher professional development in the digital age: Addressing the evolving needs post-COVID. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.12975 3. Author Unknown. (2025). Digital competence in education. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 9–23. 4. Barroso-Tristán, J. M., García-Lázaro, I., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2025). Gamification in digital environments and the development of teachers' digital competence: A systematic review. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04619-x 5. Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers' digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8 6. Cukurova, M., Kralj, L., Hertz, B., & Saltidou, E. (2024). Professional development for teachers in the age of AI. European Schoolnet. 7. Gallego Joya, L., Merchán Merchán, M. A., & López Barrera, E. A. (2025). Development and strengthening of teachers' digital competence: Systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep555. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15793 8. Heine, S., Krepf, M., & König, J. (2023). Digital resources as an aspect of teacher professional digital competence: One term, different definitions – a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3711–3738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11254-5 9. Khasanova, N. (2025). Empowering educators: How AI tools support continuous professional development. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 6(7), 285–293. 10. Lucas, M., et al. (2024). Relation between trust in AI, knowledge of AI and digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22991–23010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12638-3
Publication Date
6/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...