Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67700
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Electrical Engineering
Andhra University
Professor, Department of Electrical Eng,
College of Eng., Andhra University
The integration of renewable energy sources into microgrids requires careful selection of generation, storage, and energy-management configurations because renewable intermittency, component costs, load demand, and grid interaction directly influence the economic performance of the system. The current paper includes a techno-economic analysis of ten microgrid options in Visakhapatnam, India, using HOMER Pro software. The software was used to evaluate microgrid systems that include photovoltaics, wind turbines, biomass, batteries, diesel generators, the grid, and hydrogen storage. The analysis was conducted using the same location-specific data on wind, solar energy, and load. The analysis results in systems’ initial costs, annual costs, net present costs (NPC), cost of energy (COE), and renewable fraction. According to the results, there is a significant variation in the results in terms of costs, with the highest total NPC in the option reaching $1.42 million to $27.06 million and the lowest – $0.0987/kWh to $1.7700/kWh. The option that includes photovoltaics, batteries, and the grid had the lowest COE of $1.42 million), while the hydrogen-integrated PV-wind-grid-battery system yields the lowest COE ($0.0987/kWh and the lowest NPC of $1.604 million. Thus, it was found that increasing the share of renewables or using complex storage is not necessarily beneficial in terms of economic indicators. Instead, a combination of factors should be considered when choosing a microgrid option, including the share of renewables in the system, initial investment, operational costs, and the degree of dependence on the grid.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a comparative techno-economic evaluation of ten renewable and hybrid microgrid configurations for Visakhapatnam, India, using HOMER Pro. The study considered PV, wind, biomass, diesel generation, battery storage, grid interaction, and hydrogen-based energy storage within a common modeling framework. The configurations were evaluated using initial capital cost, annual operating cost, NPC, COE, and renewable fraction. The results demonstrate significant variation in economic performance between the investigated architectures. The reported NPC values range from approximately $1.42 million to $27.06 million, while the reported COE values range from $0.0987/kWh to $1.7700/kWh. The PV-battery-grid configuration produces the lowest reported NPC among the ten configurations, whereas the hydrogen-integrated configuration reports the lowest COE. The analysis further demonstrates that increasing renewable capacity does not necessarily improve economic performance. The high-wind configurations have substantially higher capital and lifecycle costs, despite their increased renewable contribution. Similarly, the diesel-supported systems experience higher operating costs because of conventional-generation expenditure. Grid-connected configurations benefit from the ability to obtain electricity from the utility when local renewable generation is insufficient. The hydrogen-integrated configuration demonstrates the potential of combining renewable generation, battery storage, and hydrogen storage within a single microgrid architecture. Nevertheless, the economic benefit of hydrogen storage depends strongly on the component costs, system sizing, operating strategy, and utilization of the stored hydrogen. Therefore, the hydrogen configuration should be considered as an alternative storage architecture rather than being identified as universally optimal. Overall, the study demonstrates the usefulness of HOMER Pro for systematic comparative assessment of different microgrid architectures. The results indicate that an economically suitable configuration is obtained not simply by maximizing renewable generation but by balancing renewable contribution, capital investment, operating expenditure, storage requirements, grid dependence, and lifecycle cost.
[1] “Techno-economic analysis of solar, wind and biomass hybrid renewable energy systems in Bhorha village, India,” Energy Reports, 2024. [2] “Techno-economic and environmental analysis of grid connected hybrid wind/photovoltaic/biomass system for Marmara University Goztepe campus,” International Journal of Green Energy, 2020, doi: 10.1080/15435075.2020.1821691. [3] “A PV-Biomass off-grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for rural electrification: Design, optimization and techno-economic-environmental analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. [4] “Optimization and sizing of SPV/Wind hybrid renewable energy system: A techno-economic and social perspective,” Energy, 2021. [5] HOMER Energy, “Deferrable Load,” HOMER Pro Documentation. “Techno- [6] Economic Evaluation of Interconnected Nuclear-Renewable Micro Hybrid Energy Systems with Combined Heat and Power,” Energies, 2020. [7] K. K. Kumar, S. Singh, and S. Kundu, “Modeling and Simulation of Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems Using HOMER Pro Software,” Indian Journal of Renewable Energy, 2025. [8] “Prefeasibility techno-economic analysis of hybrid renewable energy system,” Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2024. [9] “Techno-economic assessment of hybrid renewable energy system with multi energy storage system using HOMER,” Energy, 2024. [10] “Techno-economic evaluation of hybrid renewable systems for green hydrogen production and utilization,” Results in Engineering, vol. 30, 2026, Art. no. 111080.
Publication Date
10/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...