Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66388
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Physics
Vidyabharati junior college,karanja lad , district Washim Maharashtra, India 444105
Physics
Prof.Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management. Badnera Amravati Maharashtra, India 444701
Physics
Vidyabharati junior college,karanja lad , district Washim Maharashtra, India 444105
Physics
Vidyabharati junior college,karanja lad , district Washim Maharashtra, India 444105
Polymorphism — the ability of a chemical compound to crystallize into more than one distinct crystal structure — is a central lever for tuning the structural, optical, thermal, and nonlinear optical (NLO) behaviour of organic and semi-organic crystals. Because different polymorphs of the same compound differ in molecular packing, hydrogen-bonding networks, and crystal symmetry, they can display markedly different second-harmonic generation (SHG) efficiency, optical transparency, dielectric response, and thermal stability [1,2]. Crystallization temperature is among the most influential external parameters governing which polymorph forms, since it shapes nucleation kinetics, growth rate, and the intermolecular interactions that lock in a particular packing arrangement. This review synthesizes the existing literature on organic, inorganic, and semi-organic NLO crystals, the mechanisms of temperature-dependent (enantiotropic and monotropic) polymorphism, and the structural factors that connect crystal symmetry to SHG activity. It shows that although individual polymorphic NLO crystals have been extensively characterized using X-ray diffraction, FTIR, UV–Visible spectroscopy, thermal analysis, and SHG measurement, systematic comparative studies that track a single compound across multiple crystallization temperatures — and link the resulting structural changes directly to NLO performance — remain scarce. This gap constrains the rational, predictive design of next-generation photonic materials and motivates a temperature-controlled comparative research programme using the slow evaporation solution growth technique [3].
KEYWORDS
The literature confirms that crystallization temperature is a critical, controllable parameter for selecting among polymorphic forms of organic and semi-organic NLO crystals, and that the resulting structural differences can substantially alter SHG efficiency, optical transparency, dielectric behaviour, and thermal stability. At the same time, the existing body of work is dominated by single-polymorph characterization rather than systematic, temperature-controlled comparison, and organic–semi-organic comparisons under matched growth conditions remain particularly sparse. Closing this gap — through slow evaporation solution growth under carefully controlled temperature conditions, paired with integrated structural, thermal, dielectric, and SHG characterization — offers a promising route toward predictive, rather than empirical, design of next-generation photonic materials [2,6].
[1] Bernstein, J. (2002). Polymorphism in Molecular Crystals. Oxford University Press. [2] Desiraju, G. R. (2007). Crystal Engineering: The Design of Organic Solids. Elsevier. [3] Madhurambal, G., Mojumdar, S. C., & Rao, K. J. (2010). Growth and characterization of nonlinear optical single crystals by slow evaporation solution technique. Journal of Crystal Growth, 312(5), 789–794. [4] Kurtz, S. K., & Perry, T. T. (1968). A powder technique for the evaluation of nonlinear optical materials. Journal of Applied Physics, 39(8), 3798–3813. [5] Prasad, P. N., & Williams, D. J. (1991). Introduction to Nonlinear Optical Effects in Molecules and Polymers. Wiley. [6] Yu, L. (2010). The phenomenon of polymorphism in molecular crystals. Accounts of Chemical Research, 43(9), 1257–1266. [7] Price, S. L. (2014). Predicting crystal structures of organic compounds. Chemical Society Reviews, 43, 2098–2111. [8] Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Reutzel-Edens, S. M., & Bernstein, J. (2015). Facts and fictions about polymorphism. Chemical Society Reviews, 44(23), 8619–8635. [9] Moulton, B., & Zaworotko, M. J. (2001). From molecules to crystal engineering. Chemical Reviews, 101(6), 1629–1658. [10] Nalwa, H. S. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of Advanced Electronic and Photonic Materials and Devices. Academic Press.
Publication Date
7/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
36
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...