Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51604
Volume:
9 |
7 |
Jul 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The Halo Effect, a psychological bias where a single positive trait, such as charm or status, distorts overall perception, often leads to misjudgments in social and professional contexts (Thorndike, 1920). In detective fiction, this cognitive bias serves as a powerful narrative tool, enabling authors to endow villains with appealing characteristics that conceal their true motives, thereby deceiving readers and sustaining suspense. This dynamic aligns with the genre’s emphasis on misdirection, crafting intricate plots that challenge assumptions and deliver unexpected revelations (Knight, 2004). This paper aims to examine how Agatha Christie’s Endless Night (1967) and Gillian Flynn’s Sharp Objects (2006) leverage the Halo Effect to manipulate reader perception, mislead fictional investigations, and enhance narrative complexity. Through case studies and comparative analysis, supported by psychological and literary scholarship, it explores the mechanisms by which these novels disguise antagonists, fostering a false sense of trust. The analysis highlights parallels between fictional deception and real-world biases, encouraging critical scrutiny of superficial judgments. By illuminating the interplay between narrative artistry and cognitive biases, the paper underscores detective fiction’s role in both entertaining and educating readers about the pervasive influence of perception.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/29/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...