"The comparative Descriptive Research and Analysis of RCC Twisted and Traditional Buildings Using Software for Indian and American Codes"

1)      When the rotation of the structure is increases then the base shear is also increasing the total 3.1D structure base is higher than the remaining the structure. The base shear is 1% to 11% increases as compare to the other structure. 2)      The maximum storey acceleration of the structure is 1.1D is increased by 14 %, 14.01%, 8%, and 16% as compared to the 2D, 2.1D, 3D and 3.1D when we decrease the twisted angle then the acceleration increases. 3)      The Storey Stiffness 2.1D is increases by 6-7% around but 1.1D is decreasing by 66% around means when we increase the twist angle of floor then the Stiffness also increases. 4)      The overturning moment effect of the all structure all near about the same the only 1-2% slightly increases 2.1D structure. Means no effect of floor rotation on the moment. It was increased when increases the storey height. 5)      The maximum storey displacement of the structure 2.1D is increase 6% as compared to other type of structure all around displace nearly same means when we twisted the floor displacement is decreases. 6)      When we increase the rotation of the floor then the modal time period also decreases 7)      The maximum storey acceleration of the structure is 1.1D is increased by 2 %, 1.1%, 3%, and 1.8% as compared to the 2D, 2.1D, 3D and 3.1D when we decrease the twisted angle then the acceleration increases. 8)      storey stiffness is for 1.1D Is increasing by 43 %, 31%, 33.1% and 26.4% as compare to the 2D, 2.1D, 3D and 3.1D model 9)      The overturning moment is for 1.1D is increasing by 41 %, 33.4%, 31.1% and 24.4% as compare to the 2D, 2.1D, 3D and 3.1D model. 10)    The maximum storey displacement of the structure 2.0D is increase 6% as compared to other type of structure but only 10% 1.1D type of structure. the displacement is varying for floor to floor. 11)    When the rotation of the structure is increases then the base shear is also increasing the total 3.1D structure base is higher than the remaining the structure. The base shear is 4% to 12% increases as compare to the other structure. 12)    When we increase the rotation of the floor then the modal time period also decreases

         [1].     Kyoung Sun Moon (2010) “Structural Engineering for complex shaped tall buildings” ASCE (2011), AEI 2011.          [2].     Kyoung Sun Moon (2014) “Structural Design and construction of complex shaped tall buildings” IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 7, No.1, February 2011.          [3].     Kyoung Sun Moon (2010) “Studies on various structural system design options and their performances” The Structural Design of tall and special building, Struct. Design Tall Spec, Build, (2012), in Wiley Online Library.          [4].     Kyoung Sun Moon (2011) “Diagrid Structures for Complex Shaped Tall buildings” Procedia Engineering 14 (2011) 1343-1310.          [5].     Karel Vollers Free D Geometries (2011) “High Rise Building with Twisted Facades” CTBUH 2001 7th world congress, New York.          [6].     Chokshi Shreya H., Dalal S.P., “Performance of an RCC Frame Building Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force at Each Floor Level - A Case Study”, IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2319-1163, Volume: 04, Issue: 06 June-2011.          [7].     Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Rectangular Liquid-Containing Structures under Seismic Excitation, Iman Bahreini Toussi, MDPI, 22 December 2020          [8].     Analysis of Sloshing Impact on Overhead Liquid Storage Structures P. Muthu Vijay & Amar Prakash, International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology, Aug 2018          [9].     Numerical Analysis of the Dynamic Responses of Multistory Structures Equipped with Tuned Liquid Dampers Considering Fluid-Structure Interactions Bui Pham Duc Tuong, The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, October 02, 2019        [10].   A review on seismic behaviour of intze pool with varying different seismic zones & different soil condition Arvind Kumar, Rajeev Banerjee, JETIR 2018