Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM23456
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Hair is the most fundamental part of the body that protects the skin in an effective manner. Henceforth, people use some synthetic and herbal products for the protection of hair and skin. The alternative plan people have is like shampoos for protection of dandruff, hair loss and relevant treatment against dandruff, hair etc. Shampoos are the modern cosmetic products for the protection, moisture and conditioning of hair. On the other hand, the purpose of using shampoos for washing hair, remove dandruff, oils, dirt and avoid some diseases on the scalp. Amongst different species of Malassezia, Malassezia furfur is the main culprit of dandruff. The primary objective of this paper is comparative analysis of different brands of synthetic and herbal shampoos by using laboratory work. Synthetic shampoos also showed the ZOI against dandruff but the herbal shampoos showed the highest ZOI against dandruff. Synthetic products are chemical based products which might have some risky chemicals. Herbal shampoos are plant extract shampoos which have not any side effects, are less risky and naturally friendly. I compared the ZOI of herbal shampoos to a higher diameter than the ZOI of synthetic shampoos. The Zone of Inhibition of herbal shampoo found to be Patanjali is higher than Gel shampoos followed by Himalaya compared to the ZOI of synthetic shampoos found as TRESMME is higher than Sunsilk followed by Dove. This study has proved that the herbal shampoos could be more effective to fight against dandruff and have a high number of efficiencies. The plant extracts or herbal shampoos are concluded to be the best treatment rather than the synthetic shampoos.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/5/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...