Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67279

The FOMO Economy: How Digital Financial Content Converts Fear of Missing Out into Investment Risk-Taking

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67279

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67279

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Dr. Surajkumar Dubey

Dr. Surajkumar Dubey

Masters of Commerce

SIES College of Commerce and Economics

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Social media has reshaped how ordinary people learn about, discuss, and act on investment opportunities. Short-form videos, influencer “finfluencer” content, real-time trading applications, and algorithmically ranked feeds now compete for the same psychological resource: an investor's attention in the moments before a decision is made. This paper examines how digital financial content operationalises the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) — a well-documented social-psychological state — and converts it into elevated investment risk-taking. Drawing on behavioural finance theory (prospect theory, herding, and social proof), platform-design literature, and documented market episodes such as the 2021 “meme-stock” rally, the paper develops a conceptual model of the FOMO-to-risk pathway and identifies the platform-level and content-level mechanisms that accelerate it. The paper argues that FOMO in financial contexts is frequently the product of deliberate attention-engineering choices — urgency framing, social-proof counters, gamified interfaces, and short-form virality — structurally similar to those used in e-commerce and social media engagement design. The societal implications are significant: retail investors, particularly first-time and younger investors, face a growing gap between the speed at which financial content circulates and the speed at which sound financial judgement can be formed. The paper concludes with policy-relevant and platform-level recommendations for regulators, financial-literacy educators, and platform designers, and outlines directions for future empirical research.

KEYWORDS

FOMO behavioural finance financial content social media investing retail investors herding behaviour gamification risk-taking financial literacy digital platforms

Cite This Article

Dr. Surajkumar Dubey, "The FOMO Economy: How Digital Financial Content Converts Fear of Missing Out into Investment Risk-Taking," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-8, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67279

Full Article/Conclusion

Digital financial content has not simply changed where people learn about investment opportunities; it has changed the psychological conditions under which investment decisions are made. This paper has argued that Fear of Missing Out, far from being an incidental side effect of social media, is frequently manufactured through identifiable content- and platform-design mechanisms — herding cues, gamification, urgency framing, influencer credibility, loss-aversion messaging, and real-time salience — that combine to compress deliberation time and reframe inaction as the riskier choice. The societal stakes are significant, falling disproportionately on first-time and younger investors and carrying both individual and systemic consequences. Addressing this “FOMO economy” will require coordinated action from regulators, platforms, and educators, alongside greater individual awareness of the persuasion techniques embedded in the financial content encountered every day. Future empirical research validating the proposed conceptual pathway would meaningfully strengthen the evidence base for the policy interventions outlined here.

References

1.      Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. 2.      Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. 3.      Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. 4.      Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press. 5.      Barber, B. M., Huang, X., Odean, T., & Schwarz, C. (2022). Attention-induced trading and returns: Evidence from Robinhood users. The Journal of Finance, 77(6), 3141–3190. 6.      U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Staff of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis. (2021). Staff report on equity and options market structure conditions in early 2021. Washington, DC: SEC. 7.      Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). (2021). FINRA orders Robinhood to pay more than $70 million for systemic supervisory failures and significant harm suffered by millions of customers. Washington, DC: FINRA. 8.      Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson. 9.      Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann. 10.   Wu, T. (2016). The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads. Knopf.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/15/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...