Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67279
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Masters of Commerce
SIES College of Commerce and Economics
Social media has reshaped how ordinary people learn about, discuss, and act on investment opportunities. Short-form videos, influencer “finfluencer” content, real-time trading applications, and algorithmically ranked feeds now compete for the same psychological resource: an investor's attention in the moments before a decision is made. This paper examines how digital financial content operationalises the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) — a well-documented social-psychological state — and converts it into elevated investment risk-taking. Drawing on behavioural finance theory (prospect theory, herding, and social proof), platform-design literature, and documented market episodes such as the 2021 “meme-stock” rally, the paper develops a conceptual model of the FOMO-to-risk pathway and identifies the platform-level and content-level mechanisms that accelerate it. The paper argues that FOMO in financial contexts is frequently the product of deliberate attention-engineering choices — urgency framing, social-proof counters, gamified interfaces, and short-form virality — structurally similar to those used in e-commerce and social media engagement design. The societal implications are significant: retail investors, particularly first-time and younger investors, face a growing gap between the speed at which financial content circulates and the speed at which sound financial judgement can be formed. The paper concludes with policy-relevant and platform-level recommendations for regulators, financial-literacy educators, and platform designers, and outlines directions for future empirical research.
KEYWORDS
Digital financial content has not simply changed where people learn about investment opportunities; it has changed the psychological conditions under which investment decisions are made. This paper has argued that Fear of Missing Out, far from being an incidental side effect of social media, is frequently manufactured through identifiable content- and platform-design mechanisms — herding cues, gamification, urgency framing, influencer credibility, loss-aversion messaging, and real-time salience — that combine to compress deliberation time and reframe inaction as the riskier choice. The societal stakes are significant, falling disproportionately on first-time and younger investors and carrying both individual and systemic consequences. Addressing this “FOMO economy” will require coordinated action from regulators, platforms, and educators, alongside greater individual awareness of the persuasion techniques embedded in the financial content encountered every day. Future empirical research validating the proposed conceptual pathway would meaningfully strengthen the evidence base for the policy interventions outlined here.
1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. 2. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. 3. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. 4. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press. 5. Barber, B. M., Huang, X., Odean, T., & Schwarz, C. (2022). Attention-induced trading and returns: Evidence from Robinhood users. The Journal of Finance, 77(6), 3141–3190. 6. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Staff of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis. (2021). Staff report on equity and options market structure conditions in early 2021. Washington, DC: SEC. 7. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). (2021). FINRA orders Robinhood to pay more than $70 million for systemic supervisory failures and significant harm suffered by millions of customers. Washington, DC: FINRA. 8. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson. 9. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann. 10. Wu, T. (2016). The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads. Knopf.
Publication Date
9/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...