Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66788
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

PG Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai
PG Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai
PG Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping Human Resource Management (HRM) by automating administrative work, augmenting recruitment and selection, personalising employee experience, and enabling predictive people analytics. Despite a fast-growing body of research, existing discussions of AI in HR remain fragmented across practitioner reports, isolated case narratives, and single-function studies, leaving a need for an integrative account that connects AI applications with their organisational benefits and ethical risks. This paper synthesises peer-reviewed and industry literature on AI-enabled HRM to examine how AI is being deployed across the employee life cycle recruitment and selection, on boarding, learning and development, performance management, and people analytics and to critically evaluate the accompanying challenges of algorithmic bias, job displacement, data privacy, and accountability. Adopting a descriptive-analytical review methodology grounded in the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework and organisational justice theory, the paper develops a conceptual map of AI-HR applications, synthesises recent systematic reviews (2022–2026) on the subject, and draws on organisational illustrations reported in industry literature. The review finds that AI adoption in HR is associated with improved recruitment efficiency, more consistent evaluation criteria, and richer workforce analytics, but that these gains are conditional on transparent design, human oversight, and proactive governance; without these safeguards, AI can reproduce or amplify historical biases and erode employees' perceptions of procedural fairness. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for HR professionals and organisations seeking to adopt AI responsibly, and outlines directions for future empirical research, including cross-cultural and longitudinal studies in emerging-economy contexts such as India.
KEYWORDS
Artificial Intelligence is measurably reshaping how organisations recruit, onboard, train, evaluate, and retain employees, offering genuine efficiency and analytical gains across the HR value chain. At the same time, the reviewed literature converges on a consistent caution: these gains are not automatic, and are contingent on deliberate governance, algorithmic transparency, and sustained human oversight. Organisations that treat AI adoption in HR purely as a technology-procurement decision, without building the corresponding governance, auditing, and reskilling capacity within HR itself, risk reproducing the very biases and trust deficits that AI is often introduced to solve. For HR professionals, the strategic task ahead is therefore not simply to adopt AI, but to shape how it is adopted retaining the profession's core commitment to fairness and human judgement even as its administrative core becomes increasingly automated. Future research, particularly empirical and cross-cultural studies situated in emerging economies such as India, will be essential to test whether the benefits documented in the existing literature, drawn disproportionately from large Western and East Asian organisations, hold under different regulatory, cultural, and organisational conditions
1. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden. 2. Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., Dey, P. K., Guest, D., Knoblich, A. J., Malik, A., Paauwe, J., Papagiannidis, S., Patel, C., Pereira, V., Ren, S., … Varma, A. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524 3. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. 4. Charlwood, A., & Guenole, N. (2022). Can HR adapt to the paradoxes of artificial intelligence? Human Resource Management Journal, 32(4), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12433 5. Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson Education. 6. Fenwick, A., Molnar, G., & Frangos, P. (2024). Revisiting the role of HR in the age of AI: Bringing humans and machines closer together in the workplace. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. 7. Gupta, C. B. (2022). Human resource management. Sultan Chand & Sons. 8. Jayasankar, J. (2013). Human resource management. Margham Publications. 9. Jayasankar, J. (2012). Organisational behaviour [Organisational psychology]. Margham Publications. 10. Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13, 795–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w
Publication Date
8/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
6
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...