Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53458
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Commerce and Business Administration
ANU Ongole Campus
Department of Commerce and Management
TJPS College (PG),Guntur,AP,India
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming human resource management, with recruitment and selection emerging as among the most affected functions. This paper provides a systematic empirical review of scholarly literature published between 2019 and 2025, drawing on quantitative studies, qualitative investigations, and mixed-methods research. The review synthesises findings across five key dimensions: recruitment efficiency, bias and fairness, candidate experience, human-AI collaboration, and ethical and governance challenges. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that AI-enabled recruitment tools improve process speed and screening accuracy. However, algorithmic bias remains a persistent concern, with documented discriminatory effects along gender, race, and socioeconomic lines. Findings emphasise that the responsible deployment of AI in recruitment requires robust governance frameworks, transparency mechanisms, and continued human oversight. The paper concludes with an integrated framework and directions for future empirical research.
KEYWORDS
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the landscape of employee recruitment and selection in ways that are empirically documented, consequential, and deeply ambivalent. The evidence base reviewed in this paper confirms that AI tools deliver meaningful efficiency gains, particularly in high-volume screening and candidate engagement. It also confirms that the fairness implications of AI in recruitment are highly context-dependent, reflecting the quality of system design, training data, and governance arrangements rather than any inherent property of AI technology itself. The emerging consensus in the empirical literature points toward a model of augmented, rather than automated, recruitment: one in which AI tools extend the capabilities of human recruiters while final decision-making authority, moral responsibility, and contextual judgement remain with human actors. This model requires not only thoughtful technology design but also organisational investment in AI literacy, governance infrastructure, and accountability mechanisms. As the regulatory environment matures and AI capabilities continue to advance, the empirical research agenda on AI in recruitment will need to remain closely attentive to the evolving technical and institutional landscape. The stakes are high: recruitment decisions shape individual careers, organisational capabilities, and the broader structure of social opportunity. Ensuring that AI contributes constructively to these decisions, rather than encoding and amplifying historical injustice, is among the most important challenges facing HRM scholarship and practice in the years ahead.
Abdelhay, S., AlTalay, M. S. R., Selim, N., Altamimi, A. A., Hassan, D., Elbannany, M., & Marie, A. (2025). The impact of generative AI (ChatGPT) on recruitment efficiency and candidate quality: The mediating role of process automation level and the moderating role of organisational size. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1487671 Chen, Z. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: Removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00719-x Drage, E., & Mackereth, K. (2022). Does AI debias recruitment? Race, gender, and AI's "eradication of difference". Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00538-2 Hewage, A. (2023). Exploring the applicability of artificial intelligence in recruitment and selection processes: A focus on the recruitment phase. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 11, 603–634. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2023.114033 Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Luetge, C. (2023). Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x Lakshmi Devi, S., Das, S., Gayathri Kumar, A. R., Keerthana, A. H., Sai Ram, P. C., & Rakesh, K. (2024). Influence of artificial intelligence-based skill development training on employability. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241238366 Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2025). Working with and around artificial intelligence: AI crafting and human-AI collaboration in recruitment. Human-Computer Interaction, 40(13), 13804–13816. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2476715 Meshram, P. (2023). AI in employment: Regulatory implications of the EU AI Act for human resource management. AI and Ethics, 4(2), 441–458. Mori, M., Sassetti, S., Cavaliere, V., & Bonti, M. (2025). A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: A matter of ethics. Personnel Review, 54(3), 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2023-0257 Murugesan, R., Nair, A., & Krishnan, P. (2023). Predictive analytics in talent acquisition: Empirical evidence from technology-intensive firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(7), 1402–1431.
Publication Date
11/27/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...