Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65726
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Management
ICFAI
Among the many instruments that contribute to promote open and responsible corporate governance in India is corporate sustainability reporting. This research looks at how BRSR (Business Responsibility & Sustainability Reporting) affects the bottom lines of publicly traded corporations in India. Using a panel data set of 150 companies listed on the National Stock Exchange from fiscal years 2021–22 to 2023–24, this quantitative analysis draws its conclusions. With the use of four variables from the chosen set of financial performance indicators—Net Profit Margin (NPM), Return on Equity (ROE), and Earnings Per Share (EPS)—we can evaluate the financial performance. This lends credence to our claim that BRSR implementation boosts financial metrics. There is a significant positive link between financial success and the quality of BRSR disclosure, according to the results. While the banking and IT industries have robust positive connections, the manufacturing industry does not, according to our statistical data, which reveal a neutral to negative link with ROE and a negative relationship with NPM and ROA in some by sectors. Findings indicate that sector-specific BRSR gains for long-term sustainability and stakeholder confidence are sector-specific, and that short-term financial disparities mitigate these effects.
KEYWORDS
In 2021-22 to 2023-24, academics and corporations are discussing the relationship between BRSR and financial performance in 150 listed Indian companies. This study offers empirical evidence on the relationship between ESG and financial performance in emerging markets like India. BRSR disclosure quality favourably affects operational efficiency (ROA) and potential (NPM) but neutrally affects equity returns (ROE). Sector-specific examinations revealed significant variation, with substantial positive correlations in IT and finance and lesser correlations in manufacturing and pharmaceuticals. Positive BRSR-ROA and BRSR-NPM relationships support stakeholder theory that comprehensive reporting provides value via operational efficiency, cost savings, and sustainability trust to manage ESG more stakeholders. Companies with higher BRSR ratings appear to do this systematically, which improves their performance. The insignificance of the BRSR-ROE relationship suggests that equity market participants may not reward sustainability efforts in the short term because they view paper as short-term costs without understanding long-term value creation mechanisms. Conclusion BRSR disclosure quality and financial performance rose over time, with BRSR scores rising 27.3% and ROA, ROE, and NPM rising 13.0%, 10.0%, and 21.6%, respectively. These patterns show favourable connections, although causality is constrained by short-term observation. Reverse causality, omitted variable bias, and other investors are least relevant to data with contemporaneous economic events. This research affects managers and policymakers. Although BRSR is not a regulatory compliance assessment, CEOs may use it to disclose ESG issues and improve ESG management systems, including valuing communication. Accordingly, investors should use BRSRs as frameworks since firms with higher sustainable integration may have superior fundamentals and long-term resilience. Policymakers should enhance reporting frameworks, prioritise data quality, support sectoral implementation, and promote ESG standards for risk integration via credit ratings and investment guidelines. Future research could explore long-term effects of BRSR, implementation issues, management perceptions, and mediating variables like corporate governance, R&D, stakeholder investment, ecosystem maturity, and engagement mechanisms. Once time-series and sustainability reporting data is available, we will know causality and long-term repercussions. This study adds to the limited empirical literature on financial and market impact of MDR on sustainability reporting from India's unique regulatory and market context and helps corporate leaders, investors, and policymakers make informed decisions to transition to sustainable business practice.
[1]. Agarwal B, Gautam RS, Jain P, Rastogi S, Bhimavarapu VM, Singh S (2023) Impact of environmental, social, and governance activities on the nancial performance of Indian health care sector rms: Using competition as a moderator. J Sustainable Finance Invest 13(1):125–148 [2]. Alshehhi A, Nobanee H, Khare N (2018) The impact of sustainability practices on corporate nancial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability 10(2):494 [3]. Bodhanwala S, Bodhanwala R (2018) Does corporate sustainability impact rm pro tability? Evidence from India. Manag Decis 56(8):1734–1747 [4]. Dash AK, Rout HS (2025) Unpacking the ESG–nancial performance nexus: The moderating effect of volatility on Indian companies. Bus Soc Rev 130(1):45–72 [5]. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston [6]. Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A (2015) ESG and nancial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J Sustainable Finance Invest 5(4):210–233 [7]. Goud NN (2025) Corporate sustainability performance vis-à-vis ESG disclosure and R&D: Does it matter to in uence corporate performance—Evidence from India. Vision: J Bus Perspective 29(1):112–128 [8]. Kajal A, Bansal S (2025) Analysing impact of corporate attributes on sustainability disclosures through India's new BRSR framework. Int J Law Manage 67(2):185–203 [9]. NSE, Institute CFA, CFA Society India (2024) The current state of BRSR at corporate India: Sustainability disclosures improving, but data quality issues persist. National Stock Exchange, Mumbai [10]. Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R (2016) Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. Br Acc Rev 48(1):102–116
Publication Date
6/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
19
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...