Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM55820
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This paper quantitatively estimates the effect of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) on productivity and well- being with reference to 267 Indian IT professionals. The main goal is to determine which of the two concepts perceived productivity efficacy or work-life balance (WLB) satisfaction is the more influential concept in psychological terms in order to establish which concept is the strongest predictor of mental well-being among employees at work in flexible working conditions. The results provided after the analysis based on cross- sectional survey and multiple linear regression allow concluding that workers in flexible work schemes are much more satisfied with WLB compared to those working on-site, though WLB is not a strong predictor of well-being. Rather, perceived productivity benefit becomes the only important positive predictor of employee well-being. On-site, hybrid, and remote models do not present a significant difference in terms of productivity perceptions, whereas the hybrid model can help significantly lower social isolation as opposed to complete remote work. The findings indicate that companies ought to focus on productive autonomy that requires the connection of flexibility and performance efficacy and not to count solely on the expansive WLB programs in maintaining long-term well-being and performance.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...