Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.GSTCOS014
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Commerce and Management
SSGS Degree College (Aided & Autonomous), Guntakal,
Department of Commerce and Management
SSGS Degree College (Aided & Autonomous), Guntakal,
The implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India has fundamentally restructured the country's indirect taxation architecture, with far-reaching implications for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). This study examines the impact of three core GST determinants — GST Knowledge, Input Tax Credit (ITC), and Revenue Neutral Rate (RNR) — on the perceived growth of manufacturing MSMEs in Hyderabad, Telangana, while also investigating the mediating role of GST compliance in these relationships. Grounded in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Bandura's Social Learning Theory, the study adopted a quantitative cross-sectional design, collecting 531 valid responses from MSME owners, managers, and tax professionals through a structured 7-point Likert-scale questionnaire. IBM SPSS was utilized for descriptive statistics and multiple regression, while SmartPLS4 was employed for Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and mediation analysis using the Variance Accounted For (VAF) approach. The multiple regression model explained 63.1% of the variance in MSME perceived growth (R² = 0.631, F = 224.63, p < 0.001). GST Knowledge emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.534, p < 0.001), followed by ITC (β = 0.396, p < 0.001), GST Compliance (β = 0.337, p < 0.001), and RNR (β = 0.281, p < 0.001). The mediation analysis confirmed that GST compliance plays a significant complementary partial mediating role, with VAF values of 27.0%, 39.7%, and 52.4% for the knowledge, ITC, and RNR pathways, respectively. The findings offer critical policy implications for simplifying GST structures, expanding tax literacy programmes, and streamlining ITC claim processes to facilitate MSME growth in emerging economies.
KEYWORDS
This study provides robust empirical evidence that the three GST determinants examined — Knowledge, Input Tax Credit, and Revenue Neutral Rate — each exert significant positive effects on the perceived growth of manufacturing MSMEs in Hyderabad, Telangana. Furthermore, GST compliance functions as a meaningful and statistically significant partial mediator of all three relationships, amplifying the growth effects of each determinant. The integrated analytical framework (multiple regression + PLS-SEM) employed in this study yields a more complete and differentiated understanding of the GST–MSME growth nexus than prior studies relying on single-method approaches. The collective findings affirm that the transformative potential of GST for MSME development is real but conditional: it is realised most fully when enterprises possess adequate GST knowledge, can efficiently access ITC benefits, perceive the prevailing rate structure as reasonable, and actively maintain compliance. Any gap in this chain attenuates the growth dividend. Policymakers who seek to maximise the developmental impact of GST on MSMEs must therefore address all four dimensions simultaneously.
Adhia, H. (2017). Goods and Services Tax: Perspectives on implementation and revenue neutrality. National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics (NACIN), New Delhi. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 54–77. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. Bird, R. M. (2010). Smart tax administration. Economic Premise, 36, 1–5. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Dube, G. (2014). Informal sector tax administration in Zimbabwe. Public Administration and Development, 34(1), 48–62.
Publication Date
7/5/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
6
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...