Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64371
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
School of Architecture
IPS Academy
School of Architecture
IPS Academy
Urban expansion has significantly changed the natural water cycle by replacing permeable natural surfaces with hard, non-absorbent infrastructure. This has led to water flowing quickly and in large amount across the surface. In the past, urban planning focused mainly on removing water instead of managing it properly. By prioritizing fast drainage through concrete channels, we overlooked the volume of water and how fast it reaches river, causing lasting harm to the environment. This approach is clearly not sufficient, especially with the increase pace of urban development and more intense rainfall cause by climate change, as noted by IPCC in 2021. This paper critically explores how landscape design specially organization of vegetation layer, soil system, landforms and permeable surface can be key tool for reducing these hydrological issues. This paper uses the Rational Method equation Q = CIA as a key framework for analysis. It investigates three main factors: Mannings coefficient (n), which determines the speed of water movement over a surface, the soil infiltration Rate (f), which is based on Horton’s infiltration model and shows the amount of water ground can take in, and the Total impervious Area (A). Through a review of international and national literature, this paper evaluates the performance of several types of green infrastructure, such as bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, constructed wetlands, and permeable pavements. Particularly how different layers of the landscape- such as tree canopies, shrubs and grass contributes to process like interception, infiltration, evaporation and groundwater recharge. The finding backup recommendation for the policies suburban growth, as referenced by Fletcher et al. (2015) and Davis et al. (2009).
KEYWORDS
This paper has demonstrated that landscape design is not merely a visual or aesthetic discipline when applied to the urban hydrological system — it is a precision engineering science with quantifiable, measurable hydrological outcomes. The disaggregated analysis of landscape vertical strata (trees, shrubs, grasses) reveals that each layer makes distinct and complementary contributions to the stormwater management system: canopy interception, root-zone infiltration enhancement, surface flow retardation, evapotranspiration, and erosion prevention. When these layers are combined in a structurally diverse, ecologically coherent planting design, their collective hydrological performance substantially exceeds what any single layer or engineered grey alternative can achieve. The evidence base from international practice — Portland's Green Streets, China's Sponge Cities, Singapore's ABC Waters programmed — consistently demonstrates that cities that have committed to landscape-based, catchment-scale stormwater management have achieved dramatic reductions in flood risk, significant improvements in water quality, and measurable enhancement of urban live ability and biodiversity. These outcomes are achievable at a fraction of the equivalent grey infrastructure cost when GI is integrated systematically from the urban planning stage rather than retrofitted after development. For Indore and similar rapidly urbanizing Indian cities, the window of opportunity to embed GI into the fabric of urban expansion is now. New development areas, Smart City investments, road upgrades, and public space improvements all represent integration opportunities that, if seized, can establish the hydrological and ecological foundations of a genuinely water-sensitive city. This will require coordinated action across disciplines — landscape architects and urban designers specifying performance-based GI systems, civil engineers integrating them within broader drainage networks, planners embedding GI requirements in development controls, and municipal managers establishing the maintenance systems and monitoring frameworks needed to ensure enduring performance. Future research priorities for the Indian context include: long-term monitored performance databases for locally deployed GI typologies; development of Indian-context Curve Number and Manning's n values for native vegetation communities; economic valuation studies for co-benefits in Indian urban settings; and investigation of hybrid GI-grey systems optimized for the monsoon- dominated rainfall regime. With this research foundation in place, India can move from isolated GI pilots to a genuine transformation of the urban water landscape.
1 Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., & Chaubey, I. (2012). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(7), 4253–4273. Berndtsson, J. C. (2010). Green roof performance towards management of runoff and urban heat island. Ecological Engineering, 36(4), 351–360. CPHEEO (2019). Manual on Storm Water Drainage Systems. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., & Clar, M. (2009). Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(3), 109–117. Dietz, M. E. (2007). Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 186(1), 351–363. Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., & Lashford, C. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525–542. Gill, S. E., Handley, J. F., Ennos, A. R., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33(1), 115–133. Harman, C. J., Stewardson, M., & DeRose, R. (2008). Variability and uncertainty in reach bankfull hydraulic geometry. Journal of Hydrology, 351(1–2), 13–26. Jiang, Y., Zevenbergen, C., & Ma, Y. (2018). Urban pluvial flooding and stormwater management: A contemporary review of China's challenges and 'sponge cities' strategy. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 132–143. Kumar, R., & Kaur, S. (2020). Stormwater management in Indian cities: Policy gaps and green infrastructure potential. Urban Climate, 34, 100709. Li, C., Liu, M., Hu, Y., & Shi, T. (2017). Evaluating the impact of urban expansion on the ability of land to provide precipitation regulation services. Ecological Indicators, 76, 77–88. Lim, H. S., & Lu, X. X. (2016). Sustainable urban stormwater management in the tropics: An evaluation of Singapore's ABC Waters Program. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 842–862. Locatelli, L., Mark, O., Mikkelsen, P. S., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., & Bagger-Sørensen, R. (2014). Identifying cross-scale connectivity of blue-green infrastructure using graph-theory based network analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 55, 82–97. NIUA (2018). Compendium of Best Practices in Urban Stormwater Management in India. National Institute of Urban Affairs, New Delhi.
Publication Date
5/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...