Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56396
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study investigates the failure of glass-intensive architecture in Ahmedabad’s hot-dry climate through the Blinds-Down Paradox, where occupants nullify promised transparency by permanently closing shades to escape solar stress. I contrast this with the Matka Effect, describing the psychological visual coolth of earthen materials. Using digital ethnography via Google Street View, I measured Occupant Resentment by calculating obscured glazed surfaces. The data reveals a stark performance divide: commercial towers on the SG Highway showed a 78% visual failure rate, whereas institutional buildings like CEPT and IIM Ahmedabad maintained high functional transparency. To validate these findings, a Visual Perception Survey was conducted, in which 82% of respondents associated earthen textures with thermal comfort, while glass was linked to Heat Anxiety. This confirms that glass acts as a psychological stressor in arid regions, whereas terracotta and brick provide a protective skin aligned with local thermal expectations. The research concludes that for architecture in India to be functional and ethical, designers must prioritize breathable earthen skins over high-reflectivity glass to ensure long-term occupant well-being.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/1/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...