Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM49671
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This report critically examines the burgeoning integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within recruitment processes, dissecting the inherent tension between aspirations for heightened efficiency and the crucial imperative of maintaining ethical standards. By examining AI tools used in pre-screening, candidate engagement, and evaluation through the diverse frameworks of Human Capital Theory, Organizational Justice Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Critical Theory, this study highlights underlying concerns such as algorithmic bias, the risk of impersonal or dehumanized candidate experiences, and the diminishing protection of applicant privacy. It contributes a novel and comprehensive framework meticulously designed for evaluating AI recruitment strategies, integrating disparate theoretical perspectives to furnish practical guidance for both Human Resource (HR) professionals and AI vendors. Emphasizing the necessity of rigorous ethical audits, algorithmic transparency, the indispensable role of human oversight, and a steadfast commitment to responsible AI development and deployment, the report advocates for proactive measures to ensure fairness, inclusivity, and a positive candidate experience. Furthermore, it identifies promising avenues for future research, including longitudinal studies to assess long-term impacts on diversity and the development of robust and reliable fairness metrics
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/7/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...