The Rise of Brainrot on Social Media

The results of this study demonstrate that the brainrot phenomenon is intrinsically linked with the emergence of the short-form social media platforms and their recommendation algorithms. Brainrot content is characterized by its short length, freneticism, repetition, and lack of intellectual depth. The analysis of 78,452 TikTok videos demonstrated that the majority of brainrot characteristics were prevalent in very short videos, were exceptionally viral, and gained extraordinary amounts of views and shares This study also demonstrated that the majority of brainrot videos had high numbers of views and shares, but relatively few comments. Therefore, the engagement score was largely dictated by views and shares. Moreover, the data demonstrated that brainrot videos were primarily consumed in TikTok through passive engagement. The present study’s most important message pertains to attention and cognitive function. As postulated by previous research and demonstrated by the mechanisms of TikTok and similar platforms, the consumption of short-form videos by adults results in dangerously heightened levels of attention, working memory load, and cognitive fatigue. Attention dysfunction following the consumption of short-form videos was reported in many of the previous studies as well . However, it is currently too early to assess whether these effects are permanent and catastrophic, as there are no long-term studies on brainrot. This study also demonstrated that brainrot is not purely detrimental; the consumption of brainrot is a part of the youth culture of today and is driven primarily by entertainment-seeking motives. In some ways, brainrot can be seen as an extension of leisure culture with the potential to provide rest, relaxation, escapism, community engagement, and entertainment. Therefore, brainrot consumption cannot be evaluated in a vacuum; rather, its impact depends on the context of consumption, the specific video being watched, and the motives of the consumer. In summary, this study demonstrates that brainrot is a complex phenomenon which emerges from a combination of factors and involves the users, platforms, and content creators. As a result, it has significant implications for neurocognitive research and social media use optimization.

[1]  Oxford University Press. (2024). “‘Brain rot’ named Oxford Word of the Year 2024.” Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press source [2]   Alruwaili, R. F. (2025). “Scroll immersion and short-form video use: Predictors of attention, memory, and fatigue among Saudi social media users.” Acta Psychologica, 260, 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105674. (ScienceDirect) Full Article [3]  Chiossi, F., Haliburton, L., Ou, C., Butz, A. M., & Schmidt, A. (2023). “Short-Form Videos Degrade Our Capacity to Retain Intentions: Effect of Context Switching on Prospective Memory.” Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors   in                         Computing                           Systems            (CHI ’23).https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580778. (Medien.ifi.lmu.de) Open-access PDF [4]  Chen, Z., Liu, P., Piao, J., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024). “Shorter Is Different: Characterizing the Dynamics of Short-Form Video Platforms.” arXiv:2410.16058. (arXiv) Research Paper [5]   Tunca, S., Balcioglu, Y. S., Ilgun-Kamanli, A., Bilgen, A., & Yılmaz, C. (2026). “Operationalizing brain rot on TikTok through linguistic, structural, and behavioural indicators of low-cognitive-value media content.” Journal of Behavioral Addictions,     15(2),     650–660. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00241.(PubMed) Full-text article / PDF [6]   Gotzfried, A., & Heitmayer, M. (2026). “Making sense of nonsense: A qualitative investigation of how brainrot content serves Generation Z’s media needs.” Computers in Human Behavior:    Artificial    Humans,    7,    100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100255. [7]      Batmaz, H. (2026). “The Serial Mediating Role of Perceived Digital Cognitive Manipulation and Brain Rot in the Relationship Between Social Media Addiction and Resilience: An SEM and Network Analysis Study.” Brain and Behavior, 16(5), e71472. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71472. [8]   Rozati, F. (2025). “Analysing the Effects of TikTok on the Attention Span of Evolving High School Students.” Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 18(2). (Open Journal Systems) PDF / Article [9]    Gross, T., Guglielmucci, F., Narvaez Carrión, C. R., & Zerrouki, Y. (2025). Brainrot Reality? Evidence-Based Neuropsychiatric Perspectives on Early-Life Media Use. Zentrum für Medienpsychologie und Verhaltensforschung. (ResearchGate) PDF / Research paper [10]      Mostafa, M. M., et al. (2025). “Development and Psychometric Validation of the Brain Rot Scale: Measuring Digital Content Overconsumption Among Generation Alpha and Generation Z.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(12), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15120262.