Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64301

The Role of Information Systems in Management: Enhancing the Decision-Making Processes of Contemporary Organizations

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64301

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-11

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64301

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Hema Rani

Hema Rani

Center for Management studies

Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU, New Delhi

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Information systems (IS) have become foundational infrastructure within contemporary organisations, fundamentally reshaping how managers gather, process, and act upon information. This chapter examines the multifaceted role that information systems play in enhancing managerial decision-making across strategic, tactical, and operational levels. Drawing on established frameworks—including the Decision Support System (DSS) model, the Management Information System (MIS) paradigm, and emerging intelligent systems architectures—the chapter traces the evolution of IS from rudimentary data-processing tools to sophisticated, AI-augmented platforms capable of real-time analytics and predictive modelling. Empirical evidence drawn from sector-spanning case studies is synthesised to illuminate how organisations leverage Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Business Intelligence (BI) dashboards, and Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) to reduce decision latency, mitigate cognitive bias, and align organisational strategy with market dynamics. The chapter further addresses critical challenges including data governance, digital literacy, system integration complexity, and ethical considerations surrounding algorithmic decision-making. Concluding with a forward-looking perspective, the chapter argues that the future of organisational decision-making lies at the intersection of human judgement and machine intelligence, and that organisations which invest in robust IS capabilities—paired with human-centric design—will attain sustained competitive advantage.

KEYWORDS

Information systems Decision-Making Management Information Systems Business Intelligence Enterprise Resource Planning

Cite This Article

Hema Rani, "The Role of Information Systems in Management: Enhancing the Decision-Making Processes of Contemporary Organizations," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-11, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64301

Full Article/Conclusion

This chapter has examined the multifaceted role of information systems in enhancing managerial decision-making across contemporary organisations. The analysis demonstrates that IS—spanning MIS, DSS, ERP, BI, KMS, and emerging AI-augmented platforms—contribute to decision quality and decision efficiency through multiple mechanisms: reducing information asymmetry, compressing decision latency, expanding the analytical repertoire available to managers, codifying and distributing organisational knowledge, and enabling automation of routine decision procedures. The empirical evidence reviewed across financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and other sectors confirms that organisations with mature IS capabilities consistently outperform peers on dimensions including decision speed, decision consistency, and ultimately financial performance. However, the analysis also reveals that IS investment is necessary but not sufficient for decision improvement: data quality, system integration, managerial digital literacy, and effective change management are equally critical determinants of IS-mediated decision value. For practising managers, the implications are threefold. First, IS investment decisions should be grounded in explicit analysis of decision-making requirements across the organisational hierarchy, with technology selection driven by decision-support needs rather than vendor-driven feature comparison. Second, IS deployment programmes must be treated as organisational transformation initiatives rather than technology projects, with commensurate investment in change management, capability building, and governance design. Third, the ethical dimensions of algorithmic decision-making must be proactively addressed through responsible AI frameworks, bias testing, explainability requirements, and human oversight mechanisms that preserve organisational accountability for consequential decisions. For scholars, the IS–decision-making relationship remains a rich domain for inquiry. Priority research questions include: the optimal design of human–machine decision partnerships in high-consequence contexts; the organisational and individual factors that moderate the relationship between IS capability and decision quality; the long-run performance implications of AI-augmented decision-making; and the governance mechanisms most effective in ensuring algorithmic accountability. As AI capabilities continue to advance and IS permeation of organisational life deepens, these questions will grow in both theoretical significance and practical urgency. The organisations that will thrive in the decades ahead are those that treat information systems not merely as technological infrastructure but as strategic assets—purposefully designed, continuously refined, and governed with wisdom—that amplify the cognitive capabilities of their people and align collective action with evidence-based understanding of a complex and rapidly changing world.

References

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961 Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(2), 72–121. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00323 Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Harvard University Press. Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2010). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. M.E. Sharpe. Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020). On the rise of fintechs—credit scoring using digital footprints. Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 2845–2897. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz099 Berner, E. S. (Ed.). (2007). Clinical decision support systems: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Springer. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3 Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121–131. Davenport, T. H. (2013). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Review Press. Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning (Updated ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Davenport, T. H., & Patil, D. J. (2012). Data scientist: The sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 70–76. Davis, G. B., & Olson, M. H. (1985). Management information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and development (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...