Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66201
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Management Studies
Visvesvaraya Technological University – Belagavi, Center for Post Graduate Studies-Bangalore
Department of Management Studies
Visvesvaraya Technological University – Belagavi, Center for Post Graduate Studies-Bangalore
Labour welfare measures are essential for improving employee satisfaction and organizational performance. This study examines the role of labour welfare measures in enhancing employee satisfaction in a manufacturing company by focusing on health and safety measures, welfare facilities, social security benefits, training and development, and work–life balance. A quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected from 100 employees through a structured questionnaire. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation, regression, and ANOVA. The findings indicate that labour welfare measures have a significant positive impact on employee satisfaction, with health and safety measures emerging as the most influential factor. The study concludes that strengthening labour welfare practices enhances employee well-being, motivation, commitment, and productivity, thereby contributing to improved organizational performance.
KEYWORDS
This study examined the impact of labour welfare measures on employee satisfaction in a manufacturing company using a quantitative empirical approach. The findings revealed that labour welfare significantly enhances employee satisfaction, explaining approximately 71% of its variation. Among the welfare dimensions, health and safety measures emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by welfare facilities, training and development, social security benefits, and work–life balance. The results indicate that effective welfare programmes improve employees' well-being, commitment, productivity, and retention. The study concludes that labour welfare should be viewed as a strategic human resource investment that strengthens organizational performance and supports sustainable competitive advantage.
[1]. Balaji, P., & Jagadeesan, P.. (2019). Imperativeness and dimensions of labour welfare measures for employees' fulfilment in manufacturing companies of Chennai. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(5), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i5/144277 [2]. Sanuja Shree, P. N., Gurusamy, S., & Balaji, P.. (2019). Employee satisfaction on labour welfare measures: An empirical examination of manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Technology and Management, 10(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJPTM.10.1.2019.008 [3]. Sapna, Chand, K., Tiwari, R., & Bhardwaj, K.. (2023). Impact of welfare measures on job satisfaction of employees in the industrial sector of Northern India. Finance India, 37(2), 613–626. [4]. Mane, P., & Bahirat, G.. (2025). A study on the impact of labour welfare measures on employee satisfaction in the public transportation industry. Rabindra Bharati University Journal of Economics. [5]. Mishra, M., & Joshi, A.. (2016). A study on labour welfare measures and its effect on employee's job satisfaction in an industry of District Faridabad. Indian Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 47(1–2), 66–70. [6]. Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review. [7]. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. [8]. Social Exchange Theory. Blau, P. M.. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [9]. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K.. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407. [10]. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A.. (2022). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [11]. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S.. (2023). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice (16th ed.). Kogan Page.
Publication Date
7/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...