Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM24899
Volume:
7 |
8 |
Aug 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The human cognitive thinking process remains an enthralling domain of study, influencing how individuals perceive, reason, and interact with the world. In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of cognitive processing, drawing insights from the observations and questionnaires of 100 diverse participants. Through a meticulous observation process, we explore the neural pathways and cognitive circuits that underlie perception, attention, memory, language, reasoning, and problem-solving. The data collected from these observations provides valuable insights into how individuals construct mental representations of reality. Additionally, we present the findings from comprehensive questionnaires administered to the participants. These questionnaires delve into metacognition – the awareness and regulation of one’s own thought processes. Through self-reporting and introspective analysis, we gain an understanding of how individuals monitor, adapt, and optimize their thinking strategies. Emphasizing the significance of emotions and biases on cognitive thinking, our research examines how emotional regulation and rational decision-making are influenced by individual differences. We analyze the interplay between intuitive leaps and deliberate analysis, highlighting the balance between gut instincts and logical deductions. Furthermore, our study reveals the remarkable plasticity and adaptability of the cognitive thinking process. By observing cognitive development across diverse age groups, we unravel how learning and experiences shape cognitive abilities, leading to innovative problem-solving and creative ideation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/7/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...