Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54820
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Strategic Management
Govt First Grade College Uppinangady, Karnataka, India
Purpose: This paper develops Corporate Social Responsibility Impact Traceability as a reporting lens for India, asking whether an external reader can follow a social claim from project identification and expenditure to implementation, beneficiaries, outcomes and supporting evidence. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses an integrative conceptual review supported by Indian regulatory and institutional evidence published from 2021 to 2025. The review prioritises recent research on CSR disclosure quality, impact assessment, sustainability assurance and reporting credibility, together with Ministry of Corporate Affairs reporting requirements, Form CSR-2, the National CSR Exchange Portal and institutional evidence on impact reporting. Findings: Current reporting infrastructure has improved disclosure availability, but evidence linkage remains uneven. Impact-assessment references are more common than public access to full studies, and reporting quality depends on project identification, financial linkage, implementing-agency linkage, beneficiary evidence, outcome measurement, accessibility and readability. Practical implications: Companies can improve reporting usefulness by linking existing disclosures through stable project references, clearly named implementing agencies, project-level financial information, outcome measures and accessible supporting reports rather than adding more narrative. Originality/value: The paper proposes a six-dimension traceability framework focused on evidence connection, not disclosure volume. It distinguishes project-level Corporate Social Responsibility reporting from the broader Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report and provides a practical basis for future content analysis of the Indian reporting environment as documented through 2025.
KEYWORDS
The emerging challenge in Indian CSR reporting is not simply the amount of disclosure but whether the available information forms a coherent evidence chain. Companies already operate within a structured environment of Board reporting, Form CSR-2, implementing-agency registration, digital infrastructure and impact assessment. Research and institutional evidence published from 2021 to 2025 likewise emphasise disclosure quality, implementation, governance, impact evidence and assurance. Corporate Social Responsibility Impact Traceability asks whether an external reader can follow a claim from the project to the money, implementing agency, beneficiaries, outcome measure and supporting evidence. The proposed six-dimension framework does not replace statutory reporting or BRSR. Its purpose is to make existing reporting easier to follow, harder to overstate and more useful to Boards, regulators, beneficiaries and other stakeholders. The available Indian evidence shows why the concept matters. References to impact assessment are more common than public access to detailed studies, and stakeholder evidence remains uneven (KPMG, 2024). Digital infrastructure can improve information availability, but project-level credibility still depends on links to underlying evidence. The practical direction is therefore not more pages, but stronger linkage among information already being reported.
Bentley-Goode, K. A., Simnett, R., Thompson, A., & Trotman, A. J. (2025). Choice of assurance provider and impact on quality of sustainability reporting: Evidence from sustainability reporting restatements. Accounting & Finance, 65, 2135-2172. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13367 Chen, X. C., Luo, L., & Tsang, A. (2024). Cross-border regulatory cooperation and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of International Accounting Research, 23(1), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2022-041 Choi, A., Jin, L., Rezaee, Z., & Zhou, G. (2025). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and firm value: International evidence on the role of CSR assurance. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 36(3), 502-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12234 Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26, 1176-1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F. A., Bazhair, A. H., & Elamer, A. A. (2022). Sustainability assurance practices: A systematic review and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 4843-4864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17359-9 Khalid, A. M., & Rawat, P. S. (2025). Corporate environmental disclosures and role of top management: Evidence based on the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting in India. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(4), 4619-4635. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3205 KPMG. (2024). State of impact reporting in India. KPMG in India. Kulkarni, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2024). Business response to mandatory corporate social responsibility with evidence from India. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), e323. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.323 Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2021). Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021. Government of India. Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2023). Form CSR-2: Report on Corporate Social Responsibility. Government of India.
Publication Date
12/29/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...