Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM11343
Volume:
5 |
12 |
Dec 2021
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Financial technology, or FinTech, is revolutionizing the way people manage their finances. From digital payments to app-based banking, platforms like Paytm have pioneered this revolution in India. FinTech, however, is going through a fast trajectory-and not all individuals accept it in the same way. This study seeks to understand what drives people to use (and not use) FinTech services-some of the parameters being trust, ease of use, security, and social or economic backdrops. I used a combination of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. Close to 300 respondents from rural and urban areas expressed their views through a structured questionnaire, and 20 others joined in-depth face-to-face interviews. The research hypothesis rests upon Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework, which attempt to explicate why people accept or reject new technology. The results show a pretty discernible pattern: young users with a firm grasp of smartphone technology tend to go with Paytm because of ease and reasons such as cashback. On the contrary, older users stand hesitantly because of fears surrounding privacy, technical glitches, or just plain unfamiliarity with digital platforms. The trust with the brand, along with government supporting initiatives like Digital India, is a major factor. The research provides insights for FinTech companies and policymakers regarding effectively targeting different users through improving security, running simple digital literacy programs, and customized communication strategies. However, the study is restricted to a particular.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/14/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...