Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM34523
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Building a multi-headed model that’s capable of detecting different types of toxicity like threats, obscenity, insult and identity-based hate. Discussing things you care about can be difficult. The threat of abuse and harassment online means that many people stop expressing themselves and give up on seeking different opinions. Platforms struggle to efficiently facilitate conversations, leading many communities to limit or completely shut down user comments. So far we have a range of publicly available models served through the perspective APIs, including toxicity. But the current models still make errors, and they don’t allow users to select which type of toxicity they’re interested in finding. Online discussions often face challenges due to toxic comments, like threats, obscenity, insults, and identity- based hate. Existing models and APIs can help identify toxic content but often lack precision and user customization. They might make mistakes, discouraging people from participating in discussions. To improve online conversations, we need smarter models that can accurately spot and categorize different types of toxicity. These models should allow users to select what kind of harmful content they want to filter, making online interactions safer and more open. This way, we can create a more welcoming digital space where people can freely express their thoughts and ideas
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45433
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...