Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63905
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science & Engineering
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Bangalore
Assistant Professor,Computer Science & Engineering
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Bangalore
Head of the Department,Computer Science & Engineering
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Bangalore
From real-world signals captured by smart gadgets, phones, traffic monitors, and apps, a live pulse of city movement forms. Instead of sending everything far away, some decisions happen close by - right where data appears. Processing happens locally when speed matters most, avoiding long trips across networks. A machine learning model built on isolation logic spots odd behaviors before they grow. It learns what normal looks like, then flags shifts that hint at slowdowns ahead. Predictions shape how work gets split between nearby hardware and distant servers. Heavy jobs travel outward to vast computing centers designed for deep number crunching. Light but urgent actions stay near the source, cutting response delays dramatically. Bandwidth stretches further because only essential pieces move upstream. When streets get busy or digital demand spikes, automatic adjustments kick in without waiting. Traffic flow reshapes itself based on actual need, moment by moment. Smarter routing choices keep services running smoothly even under pressure. Out of the data come visuals - bar graphs, circular plots - that lay out how fast things move, how much space gets used, whether packets arrive, and delays spotted. What shows up next works on many levels: grows when needed, adjusts itself, handles live traffic, fits places where lights talk, machines respond, devices connect, patients are watched, signals fly between future gadgets.
KEYWORDS
A smart setup for traffic control mixes machine learning with computing at the edges and in the clouds. Instead of guessing, it uses Isolation Forest to spot odd behaviors early on. This method sees ahead, adjusting how work spreads across local devices and distant servers. Close-up processing cuts down delays, helping apps react quickly when timing matters most. Big jobs go to the cloud where power meets demand smoothly. Balancing loads as things change keeps data moving without piling up. Traffic flows better because predictions guide decisions before problems grow. Efficiency rises since resources shift only where needed, nothing more. Bandwidth gets used wisely under shifting conditions. Performance stays strong even when networks get busy. What results is steadier service, fewer holdups, smarter use of what's available. Picture of how things run comes clear using radar and bar displays, making it easier to see how well systems and connections perform. What stands out is that this setup grows when needed, adjusts on its own, stays steady, works across IoT setups, city tech, factory controls, medical monitoring, even next-gen signal pathways.
Machine Learning S. R. S. Prabaharan and R. Karthiga, “Machine Learning based Traffic Prediction in Cloud Computing,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, pp. 1123–1128, 2023. Edge Computing W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu, “Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, 2016. X. Sun and N. Ansari, “EdgeIoT: Mobile Edge Computing for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 22–29, 2016. M. Satyanarayanan, “The Emergence of Edge Computing,” Computer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2017. H. Gupta, A. Vahid Dastjerdi, S. K. Ghosh, and R. Buyya, “iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments,” Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1275–1296, 2017. F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, “Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things,” Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13–16, 2012. A. Yousefpour et al., “All One Needs to Know about Fog Computing and Related Edge Computing Paradigms,” Journal of Systems Architecture, vol. 98, pp. 289–330, 2019. L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001. F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z. H. Zhou, “Isolation Forest,” IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 413–422, 2008. F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z. H. Zhou, “Isolation-Based Anomaly Detection,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2012.
Publication Date
5/24/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...