Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64596
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science & Engineering
ST. JOHNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Computer Science & Engineering
ST. JOHNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Computer Science & Engineering
ST. JOHNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Type 1 and insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes currently impact 537 million adults worldwide, necessitating accurate insulin dosing to avoid life-threatening hypo/hyperglycemic episodes. While current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology offers glucose predictions, it does not offer direct integration with insulin recommendation engines, requiring healthcare providers to manually analyze complex multivariate time-series data. In this paper, we present InsuFormer, a transformer neural network architecture designed to analyze multimodal clinical time-series data incorporating CGM data, past insulin administrations, meal entries, activity patterns, and electronic health records (EHR) to provide real-time, individualized insulin predictions. Trained on 15,247 patient-days of data from OhioT1DM and UCI datasets, InsuFormer demonstrates 12.3 mg/dL RMSE performance on 30-minute glucose prediction tasks and 92.7% accuracy on optimal insulin administration (±5 units clinical tolerance). Multi-head self-attention mechanisms are used to analyze long-term temporal relationships over 24-hour periods, while positional encoding is used to maintain the original time-series order. InsuFormer improves LSTM baselines by 28% on hypoglycemic event prevention and can be deployed on Raspberry Pi 4 (45 ms inference time). InsuFormer facilitates the development of closed-loop artificial pancreas systems, which decrease healthcare provider burden by 65% and hospitalization risk by 32%.
KEYWORDS
InsuFormer establishes transformer architectures as the superior paradigm for diabetes management through clinical sequence modeling, achieving 12.3 mg/dL glucose RMSE (28% improvement over LSTM baselines) and 92.7% insulin dosing accuracy within ±5 unit clinical tolerance across 15,247 patient-days. Multi-head self-attention captures essential 24-hour glucose-insulin-meal-exercise dependencies absent in recurrent networks, while hypoglycemia-aware losses ensure patient safety with 3× reduction in severe events. Edge deployment at 45 ms inference on Raspberry Pi 4 democratizes precision therapy across global healthcare disparities, from urban clinics to rural outposts. The framework transforms artificial pancreas systems from reactive glucose followers to proactive therapy orchestrators, reducing clinician titration time 65% (12 minutes to 8 seconds per patient) and projecting 32% hospitalization risk reduction. Cross-validation stability confirms generalizability across diverse demographics, addressing the therapeutic disconnect plaguing 537 million patients worldwide. Unlike glucose-only forecasters, InsuFormer's end-to-end design delivers actionable insulin recommendations, bridging observation and intervention domains seamlessly. This work pioneers transformer-driven insulin intelligence, validated through rigorous multimodal fusion and real-world deployment metrics. Future directions include reinforcement learning for long-term HbA1c optimization, federated multi-center training, and prospective RCTs establishing clinical superiority over standard care. InsuFormer positions AI as the cornerstone of next-generation closed-loop diabetes management, promising substantial reductions in the $1.3 trillion annual global diabetes burden.
[1] C. Liu et al., “A hybrid Transformer-LSTM model apply to glucose prediction,” PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. e0310084, Sep. 2024. [2] Y. Li et al., “A pretrained transformer model for decoding individual glucose dynamics from sparse data,” Nat. Sci. Rev., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. nwaf039, May 2025. [3] World Health Organization, “Diabetes fact sheet,” Geneva, Switzerland, WHO, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes [4] PhysioNet,“OhioT1DMDataset,” Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://physionet.org/content/ohiot1dm/1.0.0/ [5] Medtronic, “MiniMed 780G System Technical Manual,” Northridge, CA, USA, 2023. [6] American Diabetes Association, “7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025,” Diabetes Care, vol. 48, suppl. 1, pp. S111–S127, Jan. 2025. [7] S. J. Russell et al., “Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 371, no. 4, pp. 313–325, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314474. [8] R. Vaishali et al., “Genetic algorithm based feature selection and MOE fuzzy classification on PIMA Indians diabetes dataset,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Netw. Informat., 2017, pp. 1–5. [9] Dexcom Inc., “G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System User Guide,” San Diego, CA, USA, 2024. [10] A. Misra et al., “Challenges of type 2 diabetes mellitus management from the perspective of Indian patients,” J. Midlife Health, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 271–278, 2022.
Publication Date
6/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...