Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65378
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Information Technology
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Information Technology
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Information Technology
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Information Technology
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Audio deepfakes generated by modern text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC) systems pose a growing threat to digital trust, journalism, and biometric authentication. While end-to-end raw-waveform detectors such as RawNetLite achieve near-perfect accuracy when evaluated on the dataset they were trained on, prior replication work has shown that single-dataset training generalizes poorly to unseen synthesis methods and codec-induced distortions. This paper extends a RawNetLite-based replication study by implementing and evaluating the full triple-domain training pipeline described in the original literature, combining the FakeOrReal (FoR), AVSpoof2021 (ASVspoof2019 LA partition), and CodecFake datasets into a unified training, validation, and cross-domain testing protocol. We detail an end-to-end data pipeline — including dataset-specific preprocessing, protocol-file parsing, training-sample capping, and resume-safe tensor caching — that was engineered to reproduce the original paper's experimental design under real-world constraints such as partial dataset availability and distributed multi-device preprocessing. The model is trained using Focal Loss (γ=2.0, α=0.25) combined with on-the-fly waveform-level augmentation (pitch shift, time stretch, and additive Gaussian noise). We report in-domain performance on FakeOrReal, cross-domain performance on AVSpoof2021 and CodecFake individually, and combined triple-domain performance, evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and Equal Error Rate (EER).
KEYWORDS
This paper presented an extended replication of a RawNetLite-based audio deepfake detector, focusing specifically on the triple-domain training protocol — combining FakeOrReal, AVSpoof2021, and CodecFake during training, applying Focal Loss to emphasize hard or ambiguous examples, and applying waveform-level augmentation to simulate realistic acoustic degradation. The headline finding is that completing the triple-domain training and evaluation protocol closes a meaningful fraction of the cross-domain generalization gap left open by single-dataset training, while leaving FakeOrReal in-domain performance essentially intact (F1 = 97.43%, EER = 2.66%). On the combined AVSpoof2021 + CodecFake test partition, the model reached an F1-score of 80.84% and an EER of 16.4%, comfortably inside the 70–82% F1 range reported for the equivalent configuration in the source literature [27]. CodecFake's codec-induced distortion remained the more difficult of the two individual cross-domain targets (F1 = 74.66%, EER = 19.1%). Future work may extend this pipeline in several directions: completing CodecFake evaluation using the full C1–C6 codec-type test partitions; extending AVSpoof evaluation to the larger ASVspoof2021 partition; exploring self-supervised pretraining and domain-adversarial training as further generalization strategies; and investigating open-set recognition formulations that explicitly model unseen synthesis methods.
[1] A. van den Oord et al., "WaveNet: A generative model for raw audio," arXiv:1609.03499, 2016. [2] J. Shen et al., "Natural TTS synthesis by conditioning WaveNet on Mel spectrogram predictions," ICASSP, 2018. [3] A. Korshunov and S. Marcel, "Vulnerability assessment and detection of deepfake audio," IEEE BTAS, 2018. [4] M. Todisco et al., "ASVspoof 2019: Future directions for spoofed and fake audio detection," IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1038–1048, 2020. [5] J.-W. Jung et al., "RawNet: Advanced end-to-end deep learning for speaker verification," Interspeech, 2019. [6] Y. Zhang et al., "Anti-spoofing with spectrogram-based CNNs," IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 15, 2020. [7] J.-W. Jung et al., "RawNet2: Improved end-to-end deep neural networks for speaker verification," ICASSP, 2020. [8] J. Tak et al., "End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet and AASIST," Interspeech, 2021. [9] H. M. B. Diniz et al., "RawGAT-ST: Robust generalization for spoofing detection," IEEE Access, vol. 10, 2022. [10] K. Sriskandaraja et al., "Robust audio deepfake detection through augmentation and multi-domain learning," ICASSP, 2023.
Publication Date
6/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...