Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM50733
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In todayâs fast-paced and technology-driven world, recruitment is no longer just about face-to-face interviews or personal interactions with HR professionals. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), many companies have started using machines and algorithms to shortlist resumes, conduct video interviews, and even make final hiring decisions. This shift has helped organizations save time, process applications faster, and reduce the human workload. But in the middle of all this, one important question is often left outâhow do job candidates feel about it? This study is based on a simple yet powerful idea: when hiring, do candidates trust AI recruiters as much as human ones? As someone studying human resource management and business analytics, I wanted to explore how candidates feel when a machine is assessing them. Do they feel itâs fair? Ethical? Transparent? Or do they miss the human touch? To understand this better, I designed a survey-based research using a structured questionnaire and shared it with students, job seekers, and working professionals who have experienced either human-led or AI-based recruitment. The questions focused on things like trust, transparency, ethics, and overall comfort level. I wanted to hear directly from the people going through the process.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/17/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...