Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67295
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-21
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science
Department of Computer Science And Applications IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems have rapidly evolved from experimental technologies into widely used tools capable of generating text, computer programs, images, audio, video, recommendations, and other forms of digital content. Their increasing adoption in education, healthcare, business, cybersecurity, software development, and public services creates significant opportunities but also introduces new technical and societal risks. These risks include hallucination, bias, privacy leakage, security attacks, harmful content generation, prompt injection, unreliable reasoning, misuse, lack of transparency, and excessive dependence on automated outputs. Therefore, the development of trustworthy GenAI systems requires more than conventional accuracy testing. This paper proposes a Trustworthy Generative AI Lifecycle Framework (TGAI-LF) for developing and evaluating safe and explainable generative AI systems. The proposed framework integrates seven major dimensions: governance and context, data and model assurance, safety and robustness, explainability and evidence, privacy and security, human oversight and accountability, and continuous monitoring. The framework is conceptually derived from established trustworthy-AI principles and risk-management guidance, particularly the NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), the NIST Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile, and the OECD AI Principles. The proposed approach connects common GenAI risks with preventive, detective, and corrective controls across the AI lifecycle. Unlike approaches that treat explainability as an additional feature after model development, the proposed framework considers explainability, safety, privacy, security, and accountability as interconnected components of the complete AI system. An evaluation matrix is also proposed to assess trustworthiness using evidence-based indicators. The paper further discusses implementation challenges, trade-offs, limitations, and future research directions. The proposed framework can serve as a practical foundation for researchers and organizations seeking to design, evaluate, deploy, and govern safer and more explainable generative AI applications.
KEYWORDS
Generative Artificial Intelligence has significant potential to transform education, healthcare, business, software engineering, cybersecurity, and many other domains. However, its benefits cannot be fully realized unless the associated risks are systematically managed. This paper proposed the Trustworthy Generative AI Lifecycle Framework (TGAI-LF) for designing and evaluating safe and explainable generative AI systems. The framework integrates seven major dimensions: 1. Governance and Context 2. Data and Model Assurance 3. Safety and Robustness 4. Explainability and Evidence 5. Privacy and Security 6. Human Oversight and Accountability 7. Continuous Monitoring and Improvement The central contribution of the framework is its lifecycle-oriented approach. Trustworthiness is not treated as a single property of a model or as an explanation feature added after development. Instead, it is considered a property of the complete socio-technical AI system. The framework also provides an evaluation matrix through which organizations can collect evidence about safety, reliability, explainability, privacy, security, fairness, accountability, human oversight, and monitoring. Because this study is conceptual, future empirical research is necessary to validate the framework through case studies, user studies, security testing, and quantitative evaluation. Ultimately, trustworthy GenAI should not merely be capable of generating useful content. It should also be safe, explainable, secure, privacy-aware, accountable, robust, and subject to meaningful human oversight
[1] E. Tabassi, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0),” NIST AI 100-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Jan. 2023. doi: 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1. [2] C. Autio, R. Schwartz, J. Dunietz, S. Jain, M. Stanley, E. Tabassi, P. Hall, and K. Roberts, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile,” NIST AI 600-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Jul. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1. [3] OECD, “OECD AI Principles,” OECD.AI, updated 2024. [4] OECD, Advancing Accountability in AI: Governing and Managing Risks Throughout the Lifecycle for Trustworthy AI, OECD Publishing, 2023. doi: 10.1787/2448f04b-en. [5] Google DeepMind, “Holistic Safety and Responsibility Evaluation of Generative AI Systems,” arXiv:2404.14068, 2024. [6] NIST, “AI Risk Management Framework Resources,” National Institute of Standards and Technology. [7] OECD, Governing with Artificial Intelligence, OECD Publishing, 2024.
Publication Date
9/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...