Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67295

Trustworthy AI: A Framework for Safe and Explainable Generative AI Systems

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67295

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-21

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67295

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Tripti Sharma

Tripti Sharma

Department of Computer Science

Department of Computer Science And Applications IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems have rapidly evolved from experimental technologies into widely used tools capable of generating text, computer programs, images, audio, video, recommendations, and other forms of digital content. Their increasing adoption in education, healthcare, business, cybersecurity, software development, and public services creates significant opportunities but also introduces new technical and societal risks. These risks include hallucination, bias, privacy leakage, security attacks, harmful content generation, prompt injection, unreliable reasoning, misuse, lack of transparency, and excessive dependence on automated outputs. Therefore, the development of trustworthy GenAI systems requires more than conventional accuracy testing. This paper proposes a Trustworthy Generative AI Lifecycle Framework (TGAI-LF) for developing and evaluating safe and explainable generative AI systems. The proposed framework integrates seven major dimensions: governance and context, data and model assurance, safety and robustness, explainability and evidence, privacy and security, human oversight and accountability, and continuous monitoring. The framework is conceptually derived from established trustworthy-AI principles and risk-management guidance, particularly the NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), the NIST Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile, and the OECD AI Principles. The proposed approach connects common GenAI risks with preventive, detective, and corrective controls across the AI lifecycle. Unlike approaches that treat explainability as an additional feature after model development, the proposed framework considers explainability, safety, privacy, security, and accountability as interconnected components of the complete AI system. An evaluation matrix is also proposed to assess trustworthiness using evidence-based indicators. The paper further discusses implementation challenges, trade-offs, limitations, and future research directions. The proposed framework can serve as a practical foundation for researchers and organizations seeking to design, evaluate, deploy, and govern safer and more explainable generative AI applications.

KEYWORDS

Trustworthy AI Generative AI Explainable AI AI Safety AI Risk Management Human Oversight Privacy Security Accountability Responsible AI

Cite This Article

Tripti Sharma, "Trustworthy AI: A Framework for Safe and Explainable Generative AI Systems," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-21, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67295

Full Article/Conclusion

Generative Artificial Intelligence has significant potential to transform education, healthcare, business, software engineering, cybersecurity, and many other domains. However, its benefits cannot be fully realized unless the associated risks are systematically managed. This paper proposed the Trustworthy Generative AI Lifecycle Framework (TGAI-LF) for designing and evaluating safe and explainable generative AI systems. The framework integrates seven major dimensions: 1.                Governance and Context 2.                Data and Model Assurance 3.                Safety and Robustness 4.                Explainability and Evidence 5.                Privacy and Security 6.                Human Oversight and Accountability 7.                Continuous Monitoring and Improvement The central contribution of the framework is its lifecycle-oriented approach. Trustworthiness is not treated as a single property of a model or as an explanation feature added after development. Instead, it is considered a property of the complete socio-technical AI system. The framework also provides an evaluation matrix through which organizations can collect evidence about safety, reliability, explainability, privacy, security, fairness, accountability, human oversight, and monitoring. Because this study is conceptual, future empirical research is necessary to validate the framework through case studies, user studies, security testing, and quantitative evaluation. Ultimately, trustworthy GenAI should not merely be capable of generating useful content. It should also be safe, explainable, secure, privacy-aware, accountable, robust, and subject to meaningful human oversight

References

[1] E. Tabassi, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0),” NIST AI 100-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Jan. 2023. doi: 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1. [2] C. Autio, R. Schwartz, J. Dunietz, S. Jain, M. Stanley, E. Tabassi, P. Hall, and K. Roberts, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile,” NIST AI 600-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Jul. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1. [3] OECD, “OECD AI Principles,” OECD.AI, updated 2024. [4] OECD, Advancing Accountability in AI: Governing and Managing Risks Throughout the Lifecycle for Trustworthy AI, OECD Publishing, 2023. doi: 10.1787/2448f04b-en. [5] Google DeepMind, “Holistic Safety and Responsibility Evaluation of Generative AI Systems,” arXiv:2404.14068, 2024. [6] NIST, “AI Risk Management Framework Resources,” National Institute of Standards and Technology. [7] OECD, Governing with Artificial Intelligence, OECD Publishing, 2024.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/16/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...