Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM49807
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
â Indiaâs start-up ecosystem is the worldâs third largest by volume yet remains weak in deep-technology ventures, whereas China dominates frontier sectors such as artificial intelligence, semiconductors and advanced batteries. This study identifies ecosystem factors that constrain Indian deep-tech growth and compares stakeholder perceptions with China. A cross-sectional survey of founders, investors and incubator managers (n = 44) captured responses to 24 Likert statements covering Ecosystem & Infrastructure, Funding & Investment, Talent & Education, Mind-set & Strategy and Policy & Support, plus a comparative block. Mean scores (1â5) reveal neutral-to-negative views of infrastructure (2.96), talent (2.86) and policy (2.92) but cautious optimism regarding funding (3.14) and founder ambition (3.21). The highest rating (3.60) confirms consensus that China currently leads. Open-ended comments highlight three recurring obstacles: limited access to advanced laboratories, seed-to-Series-A funding gaps and brain drain of skilled engineers. Results support the hypothesis that deficits in infrastructure, patient capital, specialist talent and tailored policy frameworks hinder Indiaâs deep-tech rise. Recommended actions include raising public R&D to 1.5 % GDP, creating a DARPA-style mission directorate and expanding PhD-to-start-up fellowships to unlock Indiaâs latent STEM potential.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/9/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...