Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59839
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has emerged as one of the world’s largest real-time digital payment systems, processing over 13 billion transactions monthly as of early 2025. Despite this phenomenal macro-level adoption, the behavioural drivers of UPI adoption in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities remain underexplored. This study empirically investigates the determinants of customer trust and UPI adoption intention through an integrated theoretical framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), and Institutional Trust Theory. Drawing on primary data from 215 respondents collected via structured questionnaire between January and February 2026, and analysed using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, the study finds that Perceived Privacy (β = 0.287), System Quality (β = 0.269), Perceived Security (β = 0.227), and Regulatory Trust (β = 0.193) are significant antecedents of Trust in UPI (R² = 0.469). Trust in UPI (β = 0.535) and Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.288) together explain 45.6% of variance in Adoption Intention. All seven hypotheses are supported at p < 0.001. Findings carry significant implications for fintech firms, banks, and policymakers seeking to deepen digital financial inclusion across semi-urban India.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...