Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM37405
Volume:
8 |
9 |
Sep 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to integrate into various sectors, the complexity and opacity of AI models, particularly in machine learning (ML), pose significant challenges to interpret-ability and trust. This review paper addresses the critical need for explainable AI (XAI) to enhance understanding and transparency in ML models. We provide a comprehensive survey of state-of-the-art XAI techniques, including feature importance methods such as LIME (Local Interpret- able Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (Shapely Additive explanation), as well as perturbation and attention-based mechanisms, to elucidate model decisions. Our analysis spans a diverse range of applications, including finance, education, and healthcare, showcasing the prac- tical utility and impact of XAI methods. We discuss crucial issues such as the trade-offs between model accuracy and interpret ability, the de- sign of user-friendly explanations, and the development of comprehensive evaluation metrics. Furthermore, we explore the implications of XAI on user trust and decision-making, emphasizing the importance of reliable and ethical AI systems. This review contributes to the ongoing efforts to make AI systems more interpret-able, reliable, and aligned with societal needs, providing a robust foundation for future research and practical implementations of XAI.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/13/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...