Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65198
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology
Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India
Information Technology
Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India
Information Technology
Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India
Information Technology
Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India
In recent years, the rise of digital payment systems, particularly Unified Payments Interface (UPI) in India, has revolutionized financial transactions, making them more accessible and efficient. However, this surge in usage has also led to an increase in fraudulent activities, posing significant risks to consumers and financial institutions. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to UPI fraud detection, employing advanced machine learning techniques and data analytics. We explore various types of UPI fraud, including phishing, account takeover, and unauthorized transactions. By utilizing a dataset comprising transaction histories, user behavior patterns, and contextual features, we develop a predictive model aimed at identifying fraudulent transactions in real-time. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of ensemble methods and anomaly detection algorithms, achieving a notable improvement in detection accuracy and reduction in false positives. The proposed framework not only enhances the security of UPI transactions but also provides insights for stakeholders to implement robust preventive measures, ultimately contributing to a safer digital payment ecosystem. The methodology begins with data collection, gathering a diverse dataset that includes transaction records, user profiles, device information, and contextual features such as transaction timing and location. Feature engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing model performance by identifying key indicators like transaction frequency and average transaction amounts. Various machine learning algorithms are then explored, including decision trees for pattern interpretation, random forests for accuracy improvement, support vector machines for classification, and neural networks for capturing complex data relationships. The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has transformed the landscape of digital payments in India, facilitating seamless transactions for users and merchants alike. However, this convenience has also attracted fraudsters, leading to various types of financial crimes, including phishing attacks, account takeovers, merchant fraud, and transaction reversal fraud. The results demonstrate significant improvements in detecting fraudulent activities, characterized by reduced false positive rates and enhanced detection accuracy. By leveraging ensemble methods, the predictive model achieves a robust sensitivity and specificity, ensuring that legitimate transactions are not incorrectly flagged.
KEYWORDS
The SVM-based UPI fraud detection model performs well in identifying fraudulent transactions, particularly with high precision. However, it faces challenges with data imbalance, scalability, and interpretability. Comparatively, Random Forest may be better suited for maximizing fraud detection, but SVM holds strong potential, especially when optimized for the user. As fraud strategies evolve, continuous updates, feature engineering, and potentially hybrid models will be necessary to maintain the model’s effectiveness. Financial institutions should consider integrating these advanced models into their systems while balancing customer experience and security. By leveraging an SVM classifier with appropriate feature selection, data balancing, and hyperparameter tuning, the system can classify transactions as fraudulent or legitimate with a high degree of accuracy. The continuous updating of the model with new data ensures that the fraud detection system remains effective over time, adapting to new fraud techniques and patterns.
[1] Kavithal, J., Indira, G., Anil Kumar, A., Shrinita, A., & Bappan, D. (2024). Fraud Detection in UPI Transactions Using ML. [2] Bodade, M. S., & Pawade, P. P. (2014). Implementation Paper on UPI Fraud Detection using Machine Learning. [3] Ali, A., Abd Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Abdalla Elfadil Eisa, T., & Al-Dhaqm, A. (2022). Financial Fraud Detection Based on Machine Learning. [4] Edburg, B. F. (2023). Role of UPI Application Usage and Mitigation of Payment Transaction Frauds: An Empirical Study. [5] Priya, N., Ahmed, J., & Alam, M. A. (2020). Digital Payments: A Scheme for Fraud Data Collection and Use in Indian Banking Sector. [6] Valavan, M., & Rita, S. (2023). Predictive-Analysis-based Machine Learning Model for Fraud Detection. [7] Durwin, A. S. (Year not specified). AI-POWERED SECURITY IN INDIA'S UPI TRANSACTIONS EVALUATING TRANSACTION VOLUMES, FRAUD INCIDENTS, AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES. [8] Akinje, A. O. (2021). Fraudulent Detection Model. [9] Ramakrishnan, R., Vanisri, S., & Yuvalakshmi, D. (2024). Unified Payment Interface Seamless Transaction Using RNN Model. [10] Huang, D., Mu, D., Yang, L., & Cai, X. (2018). CoDetect: Financial Fraud Detection With Anomaly Feature Detection.
Publication Date
6/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...