Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68086
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Artificial Intelligence & Data Science
Adsuls Technical Campus
Department of Artificial Intelligence & Data Science
Adsuls Technical Campus
Phishing is a cyber-attack in which a fraudulent web page imitates a trusted service to steal credentials and financial data, and the malicious link (URL) is the first artefact a defender can inspect. We describe a modular architecture covering data acquisition, pre-processing, feature extraction, feature selection, model training, evaluation and deployment. A documented feature set of lexical, host-based and keyword/statistical features is defined, including entropy and ratio features. Eight classifiers (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbours, naive Bayes, gradient boosting and XGBoost) are compared under a reproducible protocol that uses stratified cross-validation, class-imbalance handling, a held-out test set and metrics that include accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, false-positive rate and latency. The paper also discusses deployment on browsers and mail gateways, concept drift, adversarial evasion, privacy and ethical use, and identifies directions for hybrid and deep-learning extensions.
KEYWORDS
Phishing remains a serious and evolving threat, and URL-based detection offers a fast and early line of defence that does not depend on downloading the page. This paper presented a complete machine learning approach: a formal problem definition, a modular system architecture, a documented set of lexical, host-based and keyword features, a comparison of eight classifier families and a rigorous evaluation protocol with stratified cross-validation, imbalance handling and metrics that include the false-positive rate and latency. The discussion of deployment, drift, adversarial behaviour and privacy shows that a useful detector is not only an accurate model but also a maintained, monitored and responsibly used system. Combining URL analysis with complementary signals and regular retraining is the most promising path towards a durable defence against phishing. Four practical lessons follow from the study. First, URL-only features are cheap and informative, but they must be combined, because no single feature is decisive. Second, evaluation must report the false-positive rate and use leakage-free, preferably time-based, splits. Third, the decision threshold should reflect the real cost of each type of error. Fourth, a detector is a living system that needs monitoring, retraining and layered support from other defences.
[1] Anti-Phishing Working Group, “Phishing activity trends report,”APWG, Lexington, MA, USA. [Online]. Available: https://apwg.org [2] J. Ma, L. K. Saul, S. Savage, and G. M. Voelker, “Beyond blacklists: Learning to detect malicious web sites from suspicious URLs,” in Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, 2009, pp. 1245–1254. [3] D. Sahoo, C. Liu, and S. C. H. Hoi, “Malicious URL detection using machine learning: A survey,” arXiv:1701.07179, 2017. [4] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and L. Masinter, “Uniform resource identifier (URI): Generic syntax,” IETF, RFC 3986, Jan. 2005. [5] PhishTank, “Join the fight against phishing.” [Online]. Available: https://www.phishtank.com [6] OpenPhish, “Phishing intelligence.” [Online]. Available: https://openphish.com [7] S. Garera, N. Provos, M. Chew, and A. D. Rubin, “A framework for detection and measurement of phishing attacks,” in Proc. ACM Workshop Rapid Malcode, 2007, pp. 1–8. [8] Y. Zhang, J. Hong, and L. Cranor, “CANTINA: A content-based approach to detecting phishing web sites,” in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 639–648. [9] R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah, and L. McCluskey, “Intelligent rule-based phishing websites classification,” IET Inf. Secur., vol. 8, no. 3,pp. 153–160, 2014. [10] A. Blum, B. Wardman, T. Solorio, and G. Warner, “Lexical feature based phishing URL detection using online learning,” in Proc. 3rd ACM Workshop Artif. Intell. Secur., 2010, pp. 54–60.
Publication Date
10/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...