Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM58640
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Organizations increasingly rely on data visualization platforms to translate analytics into managerial action, yet prior research offers limited theoretical explanation for why similar tools produce divergent organizational outcomes. This study develops a conceptual framework that links visualization design philosophy (dashboard-centric versus workflow-centric), user cognitive strategies (monitoring versus exploration), organizational context (governance-oriented versus experimentation-oriented), and analytical outcomes (operational control versus innovation). Drawing on theories of sensemaking, digital governance, and organizational ambidexterity, the paper advances six propositions specifying how visualization paradigms shape analytical reasoning, how cognitive strategies mediate the relationship between tool design and outcomes, and how organizational context moderates these effects. The framework further introduces the notion of cognitive ambidexterity enabled by hybrid visualization environments that integrate standardized reporting with exploratory modelling. By reframing visualization systems as cognitive infrastructures embedded within organizational logics, the study contributes to analytics and information systems theory and offers a foundation for future empirical research on the strategic value of visual analytics.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...